Rule 51.1.Colorado Jury Instructions
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 51.1
Amendment History
The source reproduced here (current through June 1, 2026) records no amendment to this rule since its original adoption — no Credits line appears for it in the compiled rules. For the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the Colorado General Assembly.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 51.1 tells a judge which instructions to use when charging a civil jury. If a Colorado Jury Instruction fits the evidence and the law governing the case, the court must use it. This keeps juries across the state hearing the same language for the same legal concepts, which helps litigants predict how a case will be framed and helps appellate courts compare cases on equal footing.
Not every case fits a pattern instruction. When no CJI instruction addresses the issue, or when the facts or a change in the law make an existing pattern instruction a poor fit, the judge must write a substitute. That instruction has to state the governing law in language that is clear, unambiguous, impartial, and free of argument, and the judge should model its form on the CJI instructions as closely as possible.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are the Colorado Jury Instructions themselves the law?
No. They are drafting aids that must accurately reflect the prevailing law, and a court cannot use one that misstates the law that applies to the case.
Can a judge depart from a pattern jury instruction?
Yes, when no CJI instruction fits the subject or the facts or a change in the law make an existing pattern instruction inappropriate. The court must then draft its own instruction, modeled on CJI form, that states the law clearly and without argument.
What if there is no CJI instruction on my issue at all?
The court still must instruct the jury on the applicable law, using language that is clear, unambiguous, impartial, and free from argument, and following CJI form as a model where possible.