Rule 6.Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers.
Last amended April 9, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 6
Amendment History
[Amended eff. 10-1-95; Amended eff.8-1-2004; Amended eff. 10-24-2008; Amended eff, 11-28-2012; Amended 3-26-2026, effective 4-9-2026.]
Committee Comments
Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption
This rule is virtually identical to Federal Rule 6. The net effect is the inclusion of all holidays whether state or federal within the definition of a legal holiday.
Under § 1-1-4, Code of Alabama, Saturdays are not treated as holidays. This Rule will include Saturdays and hence § 1-1-4, Code of Alabama, will not be applicable in that respect.
This rule also excludes intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and holidays from the computation of time when the time allowed is less than seven days. In an emergency, this provision could be appropriately adjusted under Rule 6(d) or Rule 65(b).
Section 1-3-8, Code of Alabama, lists state holidays and provides for holidays by gubernatorial declaration.
Confusion can arise when a federal holiday is not observed by the state. See Underwood v. Brantley, 280 Ala. 215, 191 So.2d 870 (1966), wherein the transcript of the evidence was due on National Memorial Day and filed one day thereafter. The evidence was stricken because, Memorial Day not being a legal holiday in Alabama, the extra day afforded when the last day falls on a legal holiday was not available. By including all holidays, state or federal, a possible trap for the unwary is eliminated.
Rule 6(a) on computation of time is expressly applicable to time periods fixed, among other things, “by any applicable statute.” Rule 6(b), on enlargement of time, does not mention time periods fixed by statute. Thus statutory time periods are not subject to enlargement under Rule 6(b).
Rule 6(b) gives the court a very broad discretion to enlarge time periods, but such enlargement is to be only for cause shown. If the application for extra time is made before the period has expired, the request for an extension may be made ex parte. If, however, the application for extra time comes after the period has run, notice of the motion must be given to the other parties, and the only cause for which extra time can be allowed is “excusable neglect.” As to the meaning of “excusable neglect,” see 4 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil, § 1165 (1969). By express provision of Rule 6(b), there can be no enlargement of the time for motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, Rule 50(b), motions for amended findings, Rule 52(b), motions for a new trial, Rule 59(b) and (d), motions to alter or amend the judgment, Rule 59(e), or motions to set aside the judgment, Rule 60(b), except to the extent that the rules authorizing these procedures provide for enlargement of the time.
Federal Rule 6(c) has been rescinded. When terms of court for United States District Courts were abolished (Tit. 28, § 138, United States Code), the provisions of Federal Rule 6(c) relating to expiration of terms were rescinded. Alabama courts have no “terms” in this context, § 12-11-4, Code of Alabama, and it is appropriate to omit Rule 6(c).
Subdivisions (c), (d) and (e) of Rule 6 are identical with the corresponding federal rule.
Committee Comments to October 1, 1995, Amendment to Rule 6
Subdivision (a) was amended to conform the rule to the comparable federal rule. Additional time is available when weather or other conditions make the courthouse inaccessible. The short periods during which days not a part of the work week are excluded is now eleven (11) days instead of seven (7) days. The birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Columbus Day are added to the list of expressly referenced holidays and the reference to local rules in this subdivision was deleted. Other technical amendments were made; no substantive change is intended by those amendments.
Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 6(a) Effective August 1, 2004
The amendment updates the list of expressly referenced holidays to substitute “Presidents’ Day” for “Washington’s Birthday.”
Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 6 Effective October 24, 2008
All the provisions of this rule, including Rule 6(e), are applicable to electronic filing. This is in accord with the corresponding Federal Rule of Civil Procedure.
Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 6(dc) Effective November 28, 2012
Issues have been raised regarding the applicability in the district court of certain rules of procedure to possessory actions for eviction under the Alabama Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 35-9A-101 et seq., as amended, and to possessory actions for unlawful detainer under Ala. Code 1975, § 6-6-310(2). This amendment addresses those issues.
With regard to computation of time in eviction and unlawful-detainer actions, the amendment makes it clear that the exclusion in Rule 6(a) of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays in the computation of periods of less than 11 days has no application to the computation of any time periods in the district court in possessory actions for eviction or unlawful detainer and that "day" means "calendar day" in those computations. The amendment makes the rule consistent with the amendment to § 35-9A-141(3) of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act effective June 14, 2011, defining "day" to mean "calendar day, notwithstanding Rule 6 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure." See Act No. 2011-700.
Committee Comments to the Amendment of Rule 6 Effective April 9, 2026
Former Rule 6(b) stated that courts "may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules 50(b), 52(b), 59(b), (d), and (e), and 60(b)." The former rule did not include Rule 50(c)(2) -- which sets the deadline for filing a motion for a new trial by a party against whom a judgment as a matter of law has been entered -- in the list of rules setting deadlines that may not be extended. Amended Rule 6(b)(2) adds Rule 50(c)(2) to this list of exceptions. Logically, Rule 50(c)(2) belongs in this list, and its absence from the former Rule 6(b) appears to have been an oversight. As amended, the list of exceptions in Rule 6(b)(2) corresponds to the list in Federal Rule 6(b)(2). The federal rule includes Rule 50(d) in the list of exceptions, and Federal Rule 50(d) corresponds to Alabama Rule 50(c)(2). Otherwise, the changes are intended to be stylistic only.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rules 4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 6(a), 7(b)(2), 17(a), 22(c), and 26(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, effective August 1, 2004, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 867 So.2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending effective October 24, 2008, Rule 3, Rule 4, Rule 5, Rule 6, Rule 11, Rule 55, Rule 58, Rule 59.1, Rule 77, and Rule 79, and adopting effective October 24, 2008, the Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 3(b) Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 4 Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 5 Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 6 Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 11 Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 55(a) Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 58 Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 59.1 Effective October 24, 2008; Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 77(d) Effective October 24, 2008; and the Committee Comments to Addition of Rule 79(e) Effective October 24, 2008, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 994 So. 2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending, effective November 28, 2012, Rule 6(dc), Rule 12(dc), Rule 52(dc), Rule 55(dc), Rule 59(dc), and Rule 62(dc), and adopting the Committee Comments to the Amendment to Rule 6(dc) Effective November 28, 2012, the Committee Comments to the Amendment to Rule 12(dc) Effective November 28, 2012, the Committee Comments to the Amendment to Rule 52(dc) Effective November 28, 2012, the Committee Comments to the Amendment to Rule 55(dc) Effective November 28, 2012, the Committee Comments to the Amendment to Rule 59(dc) Effective November 28, 2012, and the Committee Comments to the Amendment to Rule 62(dc) Effective November 28, 2012, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from ___ So. 3d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 6 and Rule 59(a), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, and adopting the Committee Comments thereto, effective April 9, 2026, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.
Plain-English Summary
Almost every rule in civil procedure hands out a deadline — thirty days to answer, five days' notice before a hearing — and Rule 6 explains how to count toward it. Skip the day the clock starts. Then count forward, and the deadline falls on the last day of the period, even if that day is a weekend or a holiday, except that if the final day lands on a weekend, a holiday, or a day the courthouse is closed for weather, the deadline slides to the next day the clerk's office is open. That single sliding rule keeps a filer from losing a case over a closed building.
Weekends and holidays only get skipped entirely — not just at the end, but all the way through the count — when the period is short: under eleven days. A ten-day period effectively stretches across two weekends because Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays in the middle do not count. A thirty-day period, by contrast, counts every calendar day from start to near-finish, and only the final day gets special treatment if it falls on a weekend or holiday.
Courts can extend most deadlines for good cause. Ask before time runs out, and the request can be informal and even one-sided. Ask after the deadline has already passed, and a formal motion is required, along with proof that the delay was excusable neglect rather than mere oversight. A handful of deadlines — for post-trial motions like a new trial, a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or relief from judgment — are locked in place and cannot be extended by the court at all, no matter the excuse offered.
Motions have their own timing rules layered on top: a written motion and hearing notice generally need to reach the other side at least five days before the hearing, and any affidavit opposing the motion needs to arrive at least a day before that, unless the court sets different terms. And whenever a deadline runs from the date something was served by mail or through the electronic-filing system, add three extra days to the count.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I count a deadline that says "30 days after service"?
Skip the day of service itself, then count every following calendar day, including weekends and holidays, until you reach day 30. If day 30 falls on a weekend, a legal holiday, or a day the courthouse is inaccessible, the deadline moves to the next available day.
Why do weekends matter for some deadlines but not others?
Because periods shorter than eleven days exclude intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays from the count entirely, while longer periods count straight through and only adjust if the very last day happens to land on one of those days.
Can a court give me more time to file something?
Often yes, for good cause, if asked before the original deadline expires. After the deadline has passed, an extension requires a motion showing that the delay resulted from excusable neglect, and some deadlines — such as those for certain post-trial motions — cannot be extended at all.
How much notice do I need to give before a motion hearing?
At least five days, served along with the written motion, unless the motion may be heard without notice to the other side, another rule sets a different period, or the court orders a different time.
Do I get extra time to respond if something was served by mail?
Yes. Three additional days are added to the response period when service was made by mail or through the court’s electronic-filing system.