Rule 38.Jury trial of right.
Last amended October 1, 1995 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 38
Amendment History
[Amended 2-9-82; Amended eff. 10-1-95.]
Committee Comments
Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption
In form this rule is similar to Federal Rule 38. Indeed it differs from that rule only in an alteration of the language of subdivision (a), the provision for jury trial in review of inferior court decisions, and the addition of an exception as to default matters to subdivision (d). Nevertheless, the rule is generally consistent with present Alabama procedure.
Subdivision (a) is identical with Constitution 1901, § 11, and thus preserves the right to jury trial precisely as it has been known heretofore in Alabama. See generally Jones, Trial by Jury in Alabama, 8 Ala.L.Rev. 274 (1956). Because law and equity are now to be merged, there will be cases in which issues to be tried to the jury are combined with issues to be tried to the court. But the basic test is clear: if an issue is of a sort which heretofore would have been tried to a jury, then the party has a constitutional right, expressly reaffirmed by Rule 38(a), to have it tried to a jury under the merged procedure. See 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, §§ 38.11, 38.16-38.29 (2d ed. 1971). See also, Donaldson and Walls, Merger of Law and Equity in Alabama, 33 Ala.Law 134 (1972).
Subdivision (b) requires a party wishing a jury trial to demand this mode of trial in writing not later than 30 days after the service of the last pleading directed to the issue. Failure to make a timely demand for a jury is a waiver of the right to jury trial. Rule 38(d). A party may specify which issues he wishes tried to the jury; in the absence of such a specification, he is deemed to have demanded jury trial as to all the issues triable to the jury. Though some details differ, this general scheme is already in effect in Alabama by virtue of Code 1940, Tit. 7, §§ 260, 265. Note that the Rule treats a jury demand to be a demand for a struck jury.
Title 7, § 265, Code of Alabama (1940) provided that a jury demand could not be withdrawn without the consent of the opposing parties. Tit. 7, § 260 permitted the plaintiff to withdraw his demand for jury trial when the defendant is in default. Prior to adoption of the latter statute, it had been held in Alabama that damages must be determined by the jury if a jury was once demanded. Ex parte Bozeman, 213 Ala. 223, 104 So. 402 (1925). This rule alters prior practice somewhat in that it treats default as a waiver of a prior jury demand. It preserves the right of the Plaintiff to withdraw his jury demand upon the Defendant’s default. However, it treats the default itself as a waiver of the defending party’s prior demand.
Committee Comments to October 1, 1995, Amendment to Rule 38
The amendment is technical. No substantive change is intended.
Plain-English Summary
Alabama’s constitution guarantees the right to a jury trial for claims that historically carried that right, and Rule 38 carries that guarantee into ordinary lawsuits. But the right does not spring into action on its own. A party who wants a jury must ask for it, in writing, within a set window — generally no later than thirty days after the last pleading aimed at the issue in dispute is served. Miss that window, and the right is gone for that issue, even if the party would otherwise have qualified for a jury as a matter of right.
The rule also lets a party narrow or widen the demand. A party can ask for a jury on only some issues in the case, and if it does, any other party gets a further window to demand a jury on the remaining issues. Once made, a jury demand is hard to take back: it generally requires everyone’s consent to withdraw, and showing up without a lawyer or without appearing at trial at all also counts as giving up the right. There is a narrow exception letting a plaintiff drop its own jury demand as to a defendant who never showed up in the case, so the plaintiff can have damages decided by the judge instead of waiting on a jury.
In practice, this rule rewards attentiveness. Lawyers commonly build the jury demand into the complaint or answer itself, rather than waiting and risking that the deadline slips by unnoticed. Because the thirty-day clock runs from the last pleading directed to the issue, a case with amended pleadings or late-added claims can reopen the window for those particular issues, which is a detail worth tracking closely in multi-claim litigation. Rule 38 does not apply in the district courts, since those courts do not hold jury trials at all.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to demand a jury trial in an Alabama civil case?
You generally must serve a written demand no later than thirty days after the last pleading directed to the issue you want a jury to decide. Waiting past that point risks losing the right.
What happens if I forget to demand a jury trial in time?
The rule treats a late or missing demand as a waiver of the right to a jury for that issue, meaning the judge alone will decide it unless the court exercises its discretion to allow a jury anyway.
Can I demand a jury trial on only some of the claims in my case?
Yes. You may specify the particular issues you want tried to a jury, though doing so gives other parties an additional window to demand a jury on the remaining issues.
Can a jury demand be withdrawn once it is made?
Generally only with the agreement of all parties. One narrow exception lets a party drop its own jury demand as to an opposing party who has defaulted, so that party’s damages can be decided by the court instead.
Does Rule 38 apply in Alabama district court?
No. District courts do not conduct jury trials, so Rule 38 does not apply there.