Rule 11.Signing of Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to Court; Sanctions
Last amended July 1, 1995 · Last verified July 2, 2026
Full Text of Rule 11
Advisory Commission Comments
Advisory Commission Comments [1995].
Amended Rule 11 tracks the current federal version. Sanctions no longer are mandatory, and non-monetary sanctions are encouraged. The 21-day safe harbor provision allows otherwise sanctionable papers to be withdrawn, thereby escaping sanctions.
Tennessee courts have not seen the widespread abuse of sanctions law experienced by federal courts under the previous rule. See Andrews v. Bible, 812 S.W.2d 284 (Tenn. 1991). Nonetheless, the amended language should prevent potential future abuse.
Advisory Commission Comments [1999].
11.01: A lawyer must place his or her Board of Professional Responsibility number on court papers.
Advisory Commission Comments [2003].
A spelling error is corrected in Rule 11.03(2); there is no substantive change.
Amendment History
- As amended by order entered January 29, 1987, effective August 1, 1987.
- and by order filed February 1, 1995, effective July 1, 1995.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 11.01 requires at least one attorney of record to sign every pleading, written motion, and other paper, or, if the party has no attorney, requires the party to sign personally. Each filing must state, where available, the signer’s address, phone number, email address, and Board of Professional Responsibility number. An unsigned paper must be struck unless the omission is corrected promptly once it is brought to the filer’s attention.
Rule 11.02 provides that presenting a pleading, motion, or paper to the court — whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it — certifies, to the best of the signer’s knowledge after a reasonable inquiry, that the filing is not being made for an improper purpose such as harassment or delay, that its legal contentions are warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to change it, that its factual contentions have or are likely to gain evidentiary support, and that any denials are warranted or reasonably based on a lack of information. Tennessee courts judge that inquiry by an objective reasonableness standard, not by whether the signer subjectively believed the filing was proper.
Rule 11.03 lets a court impose sanctions for a violation of Rule 11.02, but a sanctions motion cannot even be filed until the party accused of the violation has had 21 days after being served with the motion to withdraw or correct the offending filing — a safe-harbor period modeled on federal practice. Sanctions must be limited to what is sufficient to deter repeating the conduct, monetary sanctions cannot be imposed on a represented party for a violation involving only legal contentions, and the court must describe the violation and explain the sanction it imposes. Rule 11.04 makes clear that none of this applies to discovery disclosures, requests, responses, or objections, which are instead governed by the certification rules built into Rules 26 through 37.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to sign my own court filings if I do not have a lawyer?
Yes. Rule 11.01 requires a self-represented party to sign personally, providing contact information just as an attorney would when signing on a represented party’s behalf.
What does signing a filing certify under Rule 11.02?
That, after a reasonable inquiry, the filing is not made for an improper purpose, its legal arguments are warranted, and its factual claims have or are likely to gain evidentiary support.
Can a sanctions motion be filed right away when a paper violates Rule 11?
No. Rule 11.03 requires a 21-day safe-harbor period after the sanctions motion is served, during which the accused party can withdraw or correct the offending filing before the motion may be filed with the court.
Advisory Commission Comments.
Rule 11 makes it an absolute requirement that the attorney, if any, sign, and makes the signature, in effect, the attorney's statement that the pleading is filed in good faith. Rule 11 does not abrogate statutes which require that pleadings be verified or accompanied by affidavit. The [1987] revision includes motions and "other papers" as well as pleadings. Significantly, an attorney's belief that a court filing is well founded must be a belief "formed after reasonable inquiry." The amended wording therefore imposes an objective reasonable lawyer standard of inquiry. What inquiry is reasonable, of course, necessarily must depend on particular facts. If a client retains a lawyer on the eve of expiration of a statute of limitations, a reasonable inquiry must be performed in view of the exigencies of the situation. [1987.]