Rule 5.Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers
Last amended July 1, 2023 · Last verified July 2, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5
Advisory Commission Comments
Advisory Commission Comments [1997].
The amendment conforms pro se prisoner filings of trial court papers to the provision in T.R.A.P. 20(a) concerning appellate court papers.
Advisory Commission Comments [2000].
Pro se litigants who are incarcerated in correctional facilities cannot ensure the timely mailing of their mail and, as a consequence, cannot control the timely filing of their legal papers. This amendment deletes the previous, pro se prisoner-filing provision contained in Rule 5.06 and substitutes a clarified provision. The pro se prisoner filing provision applies to all "papers required or permitted to be filed pursuant to the rules of civil procedure," including the filing of a complaint under Rule 3.
Court and Advisory Commission Comments. It is the public policy of the State of Tennessee to encourage recycling and the use of recycled products and materials. This policy is reflected in the Tennessee Solid Waste Planning and Recovery Act (title 68, ch. 211, part 6) and in the Solid Waste Management Act of 1991 (title 68, ch. 211, part 8). The underlined portion of Rule 5.06 denotes the addition to Rule 5.06 effective July 1, 1993, in which the Court recommends and encourages that all papers filed in the Tennessee courts be submitted on recycled paper.
Advisory Commission Comments [2004].
An additional method of service of pleadings and other papers, by facsimile transmission, is limited by the conditions in Rule 5A on filing by facsimile. For example, such service is limited to those documents which may be filed by facsimile transmission. Also, the sender bears the risk of ineffective transmission.
Advisory Commission Comments [2010].
The Commission is aware that many attorneys serve documents on one another electronically but, because the current rule does not provide electronic service is sufficient service, also send a paper copy of the document. This rule change is designed to allow attorneys to accomplish service of pleadings and other papers electronically without the need to send a physical copy.
The requirement that the sender shall include language in the subject line designed to alert the recipient that a document is being served under this rule is intended to reduce the possibility that the recipient might overlook the service of a document. Words in the subject line to the effect of "TRCP Rule 5 Service of Document in Smith v. Jones" are sufficient. Adobe PDF was chosen as the format because it is required for federal court filings and virtually all attorneys have ready access to it. Of course, the parties may stipulate to the use of a different format. The mailing or hand delivery of a certificate was included out of concern, well-founded or not, that an email transmitting a document could be lost in cyberspace. The certificate requirement puts the receiving attorney on notice that a document has been sent and, if the document was not received, will allow that attorney to initiate a process for promptly obtaining a copy of it. The rule provides a mechanism for a court to order, for good cause shown, that electronic service of pleadings and papers not be permitted in a particular case.
Advisory Commission Comments [2012].
The first paragraph of Rule 5.02 is amended to address service of pleadings and other papers in cases in which an attorney has filed a notice of limited scope representation or a notice of limited appearance for an otherwise self- represented person, pursuant to Rule 11.01(b).
Advisory Commission Comments [2020].
Rule 5.02(3) has been added to provide for electronic service through a court's E-Filing system, provided that such a system has been authorized by such court pursuant to Rule 5B of these rules. The amended rule authorizes E- service through a court's electronic transmission facilities as to any registered user of such facilities. An attorney or party who chooses to become a registered user of a court's E-filing system shall be required to accept service through the court's electronic facilities unless otherwise ordered by the court in that particular case. As a result of this amendment, service may be effectuated under these rules by any of three means: the conventional means of service authorized in Rule 5.02(1), by electronic transmission or email as authorized in Rule 5.02(2), or by E-service pursuant to Rule 5.02(3) in those courts that have adopted an E-filing system that complies with Rule 5B and the technological standards promulgated by the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Advisory Commission Comments [2023].
Rule 5.02(2) is amended to provide self-represented parties the same convenience in sending and receiving documents by email that is afforded to attorneys. Section 5.02(2)(d) provides that a trial court may excuse a party from receiving service by email "for good cause shown [...] ." The rule is not intended to require pro se litigants who lack regular and reliable email access to find a means to acquire it. When email service is feasible, however, courts should "not excuse the pro se litigant from complying with the same substantive and procedural rules that represented parties are expected to observe." State v. Sprunger, 458 S.W.3d 482, 491 (Tenn. 2015) (Citations omitted). Rule 5.02(2) is further amended to eliminate the requirement of a mailed, faxed, or hand-delivered certificate advising that a document has been transmitted electronically.
Amendment History
- Rule 5.01 [As amended by order entered January 31, 1984, effective August 20, 1984; and by order entered January 26, 1999, effective July 1, 1999.]
- Rule 5.02 [As amended by order entered January 31, 1984, effective August 20, 1984; by order entered December 10, 2003, effective July 1, 2004; by order entered December 14, 2009, effective July 1, 2010; by order filed January 13, 2012, effective July 1, 2012; by order dated January 16, 2020, effective July 1, 2020; and by order dated December 19, 2022, effective July 1, 2023.]
- Rule 5.05 [As amended by order entered January 31, 1984, effective August 20, 1984.]
- Rule 5.06 [As amended by order entered May 25, 1993, effective July 1, 1993; and by order effective July 1, 1997; as amended by order entered January 28, 2000, effective July 1, 2000.]
Plain-English Summary
Rule 5.01 casts a wide net: every order required to be served, every pleading after the original complaint, discovery papers, amendments, written motions other than those heard ex parte, and similar notices and demands must be served on each party, unless the court orders otherwise. The one exception is a party already adjudged in default for failing to appear — though even that party must still be served if a later pleading asserts a new or additional claim against it, using the same methods Rules 4, 4A, or 4B use for an original summons.
Rule 5.02 lays out three ways to accomplish that service. The traditional route is delivery to the attorney or party, or mailing to a last-known address, with service by mail complete on mailing. A second route allows service by emailing the document as an Adobe PDF, with the sender required to flag the email’s subject line as a service under this rule and to promptly resend if notified the email did not arrive. A third route lets service happen automatically through a court’s e-filing system for any registered user, once that court has adopted such a system consistent with Rule 5B. A court may order a different method for good cause, and both email and e-filed service are treated as service by mail for computing time under Rule 6.
Rule 5.03 requires proof of the time and manner of service to be filed before the court or the parties act on the paper served, typically by an attorney’s certificate or an affidavit. Rule 5.04 lets a court excuse service between numerous co-defendants when a case has an unusually large number of them. Rule 5.05 requires papers to be filed with the court either before service or within a reasonable time after, though the court can order discovery materials like depositions and interrogatories held back from the file unless a rule or order calls for filing them. Rule 5.06 defines filing with the court as filing with the clerk, unless a judge permits filing directly with the judge, who must then note the filing date and promptly forward the papers to the clerk.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does every filing after the complaint have to be served on all parties?
Yes, with one exception. Rule 5.01 requires service of everything filed after the original complaint, except that a party already adjudged in default for failing to appear need not be served — unless the new filing asserts an additional claim against that party.
Can documents be served by email in Tennessee civil cases?
Yes. Rule 5.02 allows service by emailing a document in Adobe PDF format, provided the subject line identifies it as a service under the rule and the sender promptly resends if notified the email was not received.
Do discovery papers like depositions have to be filed with the court?
Not automatically. Rule 5.05 lets the court order that depositions, interrogatories, and similar discovery material not be filed with the clerk unless a rule, order, or a party’s request calls for it.
Advisory Commission Comments.
Rule 5 requires service of pleadings filed subsequent to the original complaint, orders, written motions, discovery papers, and other papers, upon each of the parties. Exceptions are made with respect to motions which may be heard ex parte (Rule 5.01), and with respect to pleadings filed by various defendants when the court orders that, because of numerous defendants, pleadings need not be served as between defendants (Rule 5.04). The Rule spells out the details of how service shall be made, and provides that proof of service is accomplished by certificate of a member of the bar, or by affidavit of the person serving the copy, or by other proof satisfactory to the court. The details set out in the Rule are designed to give every reasonable assurance that a copy of the pertinent papers in the suit actually reach adversary parties through their counsel or directly. The Rule provides that copies need not be served on parties adjudged in default for failure to appear; but if the pleadings assert new or additional claims for relief against such parties in default, copies must be served upon the parties. Rule 55 sets out the circumstances and procedures for entering judgment by default for failure to appear.
5.01: In litigation involving more parties than a single plaintiff and single defendant, it sometimes is essential for every party to keep abreast of all procedural developments despite the lack of a direct effect on each litigant. Consequently, the Commission advises deletion of the "affected thereby" language; all papers must be served on all parties "unless the court otherwise orders." [1984.]
5.05: Often there is no utility in filing discovery papers with the clerk, and the amendment gives parties and judges the option of abandoning the requirement. A local court rule could constitute an "order" on the court's initiative. Because filing of such papers may be a necessary step toward offering them into evidence, however, the final wording is included: "or for use in the proceedings." [1984.]