Rule 2317.Successful Party not Required to Enter into Recognizance or Undertaking.
Adopted July 10, 1939 · Last amended April 18, 1975 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2317
Plain-English Summary
Sometimes an interpleaded claimant is never served. Rule 2316 still lets the winning party collect, and this rule keeps the court from attaching strings to that recovery. The court may not require the party ultimately found entitled to recover to enter into a recognizance or undertaking to interplead with any unserved claimant who later asserts against the defendant a claim set out in the interpleader petition.
Nor may the court require that party to indemnify the defendant for any liability or loss if the unserved claimant succeeds on such a claim against the defendant. The protection is specific: it concerns claimants who were not served and the claims described in the defendant’s petition.
The rule fits with Rule 2307(b), under which a defendant that complies with the payment order is discharged only as to the plaintiff and to interpleaded claimants who were served. Serving every claimant under Rule 2308 is how the defendant secures a complete discharge.
Frequently Asked Questions
Must the winning claimant protect the defendant against claimants who were not served?
No. The court may not require the party found entitled to recover to enter into a recognizance or undertaking to interplead with a claimant who was not served, or to indemnify the defendant against loss if that claimant later succeeds against the defendant.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 2317 adopted July 10, 1939, effective January 22, 1940; amended April 18, 1975, effective immediately, 5 Pa.B. 1820.