RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 2317.Successful Party not Required to Enter into Recognizance or Undertaking.

Adopted July 10, 1939 · Last amended April 18, 1975 · Last verified June 30, 2026

In one sentenceRule 2317 bars the court from requiring the winning party in an interpleader to enter into a recognizance or undertaking to interplead with an unserved claimant, or to indemnify the defendant if that claimant later succeeds against it.

Full Text of Rule 2317

Text size

The court shall not require the party ultimately found entitled to recover to enter into a recognizance or undertaking to interplead with any claimant not served should such claimant assert against the defendant any claim set forth in the defendant’s petition for interpleader or to indemnify the defendant for any liability or loss should the claimant not served successfully assert such a claim against the defendant.
End

Plain-English Summary

Sometimes an interpleaded claimant is never served. Rule 2316 still lets the winning party collect, and this rule keeps the court from attaching strings to that recovery. The court may not require the party ultimately found entitled to recover to enter into a recognizance or undertaking to interplead with any unserved claimant who later asserts against the defendant a claim set out in the interpleader petition.

Nor may the court require that party to indemnify the defendant for any liability or loss if the unserved claimant succeeds on such a claim against the defendant. The protection is specific: it concerns claimants who were not served and the claims described in the defendant’s petition.

The rule fits with Rule 2307(b), under which a defendant that complies with the payment order is discharged only as to the plaintiff and to interpleaded claimants who were served. Serving every claimant under Rule 2308 is how the defendant secures a complete discharge.

Frequently Asked Questions

Must the winning claimant protect the defendant against claimants who were not served?

No. The court may not require the party found entitled to recover to enter into a recognizance or undertaking to interplead with a claimant who was not served, or to indemnify the defendant against loss if that claimant later succeeds against the defendant.

Amendment History

The provisions of this Rule 2317 adopted July 10, 1939, effective January 22, 1940; amended April 18, 1975, effective immediately, 5 Pa.B. 1820.

Source & verification. Rule text, the Official Note, and the amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Pennsylvania Code, Title 231, the official compilation of rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Last verified June 30, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: no recognizance interpleaderno security interpleader winnersuccessful party security