Rule 68.Offer of Judgment
Last amended July 1, 1970 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 68
Amendment History
Effective Date: July 1, 1970
Plain-English Summary
Any party may make an offer of judgment, but if the opposing party refuses it, the offering party may not file the offer with the court for use in a later proceeding to determine costs. Ohio's rule departs from the federal version of this rule, which allows an unaccepted offer to shift costs onto a plaintiff who later recovers less than the offer -- a mechanism the Ohio rule doesn't adopt because it was viewed as one-sided and a burden on a plaintiff's right to a jury trial. This rule doesn't limit any party's ability to make or accept voluntary offers of settlement outside the rule's framework.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if an offer of judgment is refused?
The offering party can't file it with the court or use it in a later proceeding to determine costs -- unlike the federal rule, Ohio's version doesn't let a refused offer shift costs onto the party who refused it.
Why doesn't Ohio use the federal cost-shifting version of the offer-of-judgment rule?
It was seen as one-sided, since it could pressure a plaintiff to accept an offer rather than exercise the right to a jury trial.
Does Rule 68 stop parties from making other kinds of settlement offers?
No. The rule only addresses offers of judgment made under Rule 68 itself; it doesn't limit other voluntary settlement offers.