Rule 6.Time

Last amended January 1, 2020 · Last verified July 1, 2026

In one sentenceRule 6 tells courts and parties how to count any deadline in the rules, a court order, or a statute — counting every day including weekends and holidays for periods of 7 days or more — and lets a court enlarge a deadline for good cause or, once it has passed, for excusable neglect.

Full Text of Rule 6

Text sizeJump to: (6.01) (6.02) (6.03) (6.04) (6.05)

6.01 Computation

a Computing Time. The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in these rules, in any local rule or court order, or in any statute that does not specify a method of computing time.

1 Period Stated in Days or a Longer Unit of Time. When the period is stated in days or a longer unit of time:

A exclude the day of the event that triggers the period;

B count every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays; and

C include the last day of the period, but if the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

2 Periods Shorter than 7 Days. Only if expressly so provided by any other rule or statute, a time period that is less than 7 days may exclude intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays.

3 Period Stated in Hours. When the period is stated in hours:

A begin counting immediately on the occurrence of the event that triggers the period;

B count every hour, including hours occurring during intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays; and

C if the period would end on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the same time on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

4 Inaccessibility of the Court Administrator’s Office. Unless the court orders otherwise, if the court administrator’s office is inaccessible:

A on the last day for filing or service under Rule 6.01(a)(1), then the time for filing is extended to the first accessible day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday; or

B during the last hour for filing under Rule 6.01(a)(1), then the time for filing is extended to the same time on the first accessible day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

b “Last Day” Defined. Unless a different time is set by a statute, local rule, or court order, the last day ends:

1 for electronic filing, at 11:59 p.m. local Minnesota time; and

2 for filing by other means, when the Court Administrator’s office is scheduled to close.

c “Next Day” Defined. The “next day” is determined by continuing to count forward when the period is measured after an event and backward when measured before an event.

d Definition of Legal Holiday. As used in this rule and in Rule 77(c), “legal holiday” includes any holiday designated in Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd. 5, as a holiday for the state or any state-wide branch of government and any day that the United States Mail does not operate.

e Additional Time After Service by Mail or Service Late in Day. Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other document upon the party, and the notice or document is served upon the party by United States Mail, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed period. If service is made by any means other than United States Mail and accomplished after 5:00 p.m. local Minnesota time on the day of service, 1 additional day shall be added to the prescribed period.

6.02 Enlargement When by statute, by these rules, by a notice given thereunder, or by order of court an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for cause shown may, at any time in its discretion, (1) with or without motion or notice order the period enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order, or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules 4.043, 59.03, 59.05, and 60.02 except to the extent and under the conditions stated in them.

6.03 Unaffected by Expiration of Term The continued existence or the expiration of a term of court does not affect or limit the period of time provided for the taking of any action or proceeding, or affect the power of the court to act or take any proceeding in any action which has been pending before it.

6.04 For Motions; Affidavits The deadlines for service and filing of motions, as well as affidavits and other documents in support of responding to motions, are governed by the Minnesota General Rules of Practice.

6.05 [Abrogated]

Advisory Committee Comments

Advisory Committee Comments--1996 Amendments

The amendment to Rule 6.01 conforms the rule to its federal counterpart. The committee believes it is desirable to define explicitly what constitutes a "legal holiday." Given the nature of Minnesota’s weather, the committee believes specific provision for dealing with inclement weather should be made in the rules. The federal rule enumerates specific holidays. That drafting approach is not feasible in Minnesota because Minnesota

Statutes, section 645.44, subdivision 5, defines legal holidays, but allows the judiciary to pick either Columbus Day or the Friday after Thanksgiving as a holiday. Whichever is selected is defined to be a holiday under the rule. The amendment to Rule 6.05 conforms the rule to the federal rule except for the last sentence which is new and has no federal counterpart. This provision is intended to discourage the unseemly practices of sliding a “service” under the door of opposing counsel or sending a facsimile transmission after the close of business and asserting timely service. Such service will be timely under the rules, but will add a day to the time to respond. If the paper is due to be served a fixed number of days before an event, that number should be increased by one as well, making it necessary to serve late in the day before the deadline.

Advisory Committee Comment—2007 Amendment

Rule 6.01 is amended to remove potential ambiguity in the existing rule. The rule is ambiguous because of the odd definition of “holiday” in MINN. STAT. § 645.44, subd. 5, and its ambiguity over how Columbus Day is treated. Additionally, because the rules explicitly provide for service by mail, the court recognized that a “mail holiday” should be a “legal holiday” for the purpose of this rule. The rule excuses filing on the last day of a time period if the court administrator’s office is inaccessible. The amended rule replaces an indefinite concept of the court administrator’s office being “inaccessible” with a more definite formulation: the office of the administrator of the court where the action is pending must actually be closed. Rule 6.05 is amended to make the rule definite as to what forms of service qualify as “service by mail.” The rule as amended explicitly allows three additional days only for service by United States Mail; the use of any other delivery or courier service does not constitute “United States Mail,” and therefore does not qualify for additional time. This rule is now consistent with Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.05, which specifies “first-class mail” as the means for service by mail.

Advisory Committee Comment—2012 Amendment

Rule 6.01 is amended to add unavailability of the court-authorized e-filing and e- service system as a circumstance that would result in the extension of the time period. This extension applies only where the system problem occurs on the last day of the period and should only apply where the problem is not momentary. The rule requires that unavailability of the e-filing system actually prevent compliance with the service or filing requirements. This certainly eliminates use of a short-lived shutdown from extending the deadline except, possibly, where it occurs right at the end of the day. Where the shutdown occurs for a substantial part of the day and where it continues through the close of business, then the additional day would be automatically applied.

Advisory Committee Comment—2015 Amendment

Rule 6.05 is amended to remove a potential ambiguity in the existing rule—the 5:00 p.m. deadline for service is to be accomplished without allowing an additional day for response is defined to be Minnesota time. This provision will be especially important for service using the court’s E-Filing System, by which service could be effected from anywhere in the world.

Advisory Committee Comment—2020 Amendment

The amendments to Rule 6.01 are important and are the key to the amendments to several other rules relating to timing. These amendments implement the adoption of a standard “day” for counting deadlines under the rules—counting all days regardless of the length of the period and standardizing the time periods, where practicable, to a 7-, 14-, 21- or 28-day schedule. The most important change is found in Rule 6.01(a)(1)(B), which establishes “a day is a day”—all days during a period under the rules, regardless of length, are included, including weekends and legal holidays. This change mirrors a set of changes made in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and is intended to create substantial similarity between “state days” and “federal days.” Minnesota and the federal government recognize slightly different legal holidays. Rule 4.06 has for years required that proof of service include the time of service for all forms of service other than service by publication. Compliance with Rule 4.06 is especially important because of the need to know the time of service in order to calculate response deadlines. Rule 6.01(c) is also an important provision that will affect many deadlines. It establishes an explicit rule for how days are counted when counting “backwards” from a deadline. The rule requires that, when counting backwards from an event, and the last day falls on a weekend or holiday, the counting continues to the next earlier date that is not a weekend or holiday. This rule is modeled on its federal counterpart and is intended to create greater uniformity in timing between state and federal court matters. Rule 6.01(e) appears as new text, but is the former Rule 6.05 relocated to Rule 6.01 because it addresses the same timing matters. Rule 6.04 is rewritten because it is superseded by the more specific provisions of Rule 115 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice. Additionally, Rule 56 of the civil rules establishes a very important deadline for summary judgment motions—“in no event shall the motion be served less than 14 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” Minn. R. Civ. P. 56.02. This limit on shortened notice recognizes the power of the summary judgment motion and its potential to be case or defense-terminating and provides an opportunity for the responding party to prepare a response and be heard. Rule 6.05 is abrogated only because its text is now incorporated in Rule 6.01(e).

Amendment History

(Amended effective January 1, 2020.)
(Amended effective January 1, 2020.)

Plain-English Summary

Rule 6.01(a) sets the default computation method: exclude the day of the triggering event, count every day including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, and if the last day of the period lands on a weekend or holiday, extend the period to the next day that is not. A 2020 amendment adopted this “a day is a day” approach across the board, replacing an older practice of skipping weekends and holidays on short deadlines; a period is only allowed to exclude those days if another rule or statute expressly says so and the period is shorter than 7 days. The rule also sets separate counting methods for periods stated in hours and for a court administrator’s office that becomes inaccessible on the last day.

Rule 6.02 lets a court enlarge a deadline for cause shown. If the request comes before the original period expires, the court has broad discretion to grant it, with or without a motion or notice. If the request comes after the period has already run out, the court may still permit the act if the delay resulted from excusable neglect — except for a short list of deadlines, including those under Rules 4.043, 59.03, 59.05, and 60.02, which can only be extended to the extent those specific rules allow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do weekends and holidays count toward a Minnesota court deadline?

Generally yes. Since a 2020 amendment, Rule 6.01(a) counts every day, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, for periods of 7 days or longer. Only a period shorter than 7 days may exclude those days, and only if another rule or statute says so.

What happens if the last day of my deadline falls on a weekend?

The period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

Can a missed deadline still be extended?

Sometimes. Rule 6.02 lets a court permit a late act if the delay was the result of excusable neglect, except for a handful of deadlines the rule specifically excludes from that extension.

Source & verification. The rule text and Advisory Committee Comments are reproduced verbatim from the official Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure (Minn. R. Civ. P. 6). Prescribed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota (Minn. Stat. § 480.051). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified July 1, 2026. · Official source

Also known as: computing deadlinescounting daysextension of timeexcusable neglect