Rule 30.Depositions Upon Oral Examination
Last amended January 1, 2025 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 30
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment--1993 Amendments
Rule 30.02(d)(1) is amended to change slightly the arrangements for handling the videotape record of a deposition taken by that means. At the present time the rule requires the videotape operator to retain possession of the videotape, a circumstance which sometimes makes it difficult to procure the videotape for use at a trial which takes place long after the deposition was taken. The amendment directs the lawyer for the party taking the deposition to retain custody of the video recording after it has been sealed and marked for identification purposes. This procedure is consistent with the procedure for handling original typewritten deposition transcripts pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 30.06(a). When the Advisory Committee recommended the addition of Rule 30.02(h) in 1988, the members of the committee hoped that it would be a useful device for curbing discovery abuses, but it appears that the rule is almost never used. The deletion of this portion of the rule should not be taken as any support for expanded discovery. The authority to control discovery is amply set forth in other rules, see, e.g., Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 111 & 112, and the committee encourages the continued vigorous exercise of this authority for the protection of all litigants and to carry out the mandate of Minn. R. Civ. P. 1, which provides that the Rules of Civil Procedure “shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.”
Advisory Committee Comment—2006 Amendment
Rule 30.02 is amended only to add subsection titles. This change is made for convenience and consistency with the style of other rules, and is not intended to affect the rule’s interpretation. Rule 30.02(g) is amended to renumber one of the rule cross- references to reflect the amendment and renumbering of Rule 45 as part of the amendments effective January 1, 2006.
Advisory Committee Comment—2025 Amendment
Rule 30.02(a) is amended to allow a party seeking to conduct a deposition to elect the method by which the deposition shall be conducted, and to allow parties to conduct depositions via remote technology. As a discretionary choice, no showing of good cause, or requirement of an agreement, or any other prerequisite is necessary prior to the noticing party’s election to conduct a deposition in person or by remote technology. This new rule provides that the noticing party’s election shall be the presumptive method for conducting the noticed deposition, but that a party or the deponent may rebut that presumption through a showing of good cause.
Rule 30.02(b) is amended to expressly permit the recording of remote-technology depositions via the recording technology provided by the videoconference platform, as an additional recording method. Such a recording should be viewed no differently than a recording taken by a videographer in person. The rule also makes clear that the party taking the deposition may itself enable the recording, and that there is no requirement that a certified videographer press the record button or otherwise enable the recording feature of the remote technology being utilized for the deposition.
Additionally, Rule 30.02(b) places the responsibility for maintaining a copy of any videoconference recording on the party taking the deposition. This amendment modernizes the procedure referenced in the Advisory Committee Comment to the 1993 Amendment, in which the lawyer for the party taking the deposition was to retain custody of a physical videotape.
Rule 30.02(b) is also amended to delete the statement that the taking of video depositions is governed by all other rules governing the taking of depositions unless the nature of the video deposition makes compliance impossible or necessary. A similar but broader statement, which includes depositions taken by any remote technology, has been added to Rule 30.02(g).
Rule 30.02(g) is further amended to delete the requirement that the Court approve a remote deposition by motion, since that may be done now on notice.
Advisory Committee Comment—2006 Amendment
Rule 30.04(a) is amended to remove an ambiguity in the current rule. As amended, the rule expressly extends the prohibition against improper instruction of a deponent not to answer to all persons (including counsel for a non-party witness), instead of just “parties.” Rule 30.04(b) is amended to adopt a specific time limit on depositions. Although parties may agree to a longer deposition and the court can determine that longer examination is appropriate, a deposition is made subject to a limit of one day lasting seven hours. This amendment is identical to the change in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(2) made in 2000. The purpose of this amendment is to decrease the burden of discovery on witnesses and to encourage focused examination of all deponents. Where the examining party engages in proper and focused examination and encounters unhelpful responses or inappropriate objections, or where the issues in the case dictate that additional time is necessary to permit a fair examination, the court is required to provide it. The rule establishes a presumptive limit on the length of depositions, not the presumptive length. Most depositions will continue to be much shorter than seven hours, and the rule does not limit courts from establishing shorter time limits in particular cases.
Advisory Committee Comment – 2023 Amendment
Rule 30.04(b) is amended to correct a cross reference to Rule 26.02.
Advisory Committee Comments--1996 Amendments
These amendments substantially conform the rule to its federal counterpart. The committee believes it is particularly desirable to have the rules governing the mechanics of taking depositions conform to the federal rules because many depositions are taken for use in parallel state and federal proceedings or in distant locations before reporters who can be expected to know the federal procedures but may not know idiosyncratic Minnesota rules. Rule 30.04 is largely new and includes important provisions governing the conduct of depositions. Most important is Rule 30.04(a), which is intended to constrain the conduct of attorneys at depositions. The rule limits deposition objections to concise statements that are directed to the record and not so suggesting a possible answer to the deponent. This rule is intended to set a high standard for conduct of depositions. The problem of deposition misconduct, though probably not as severe as has been noted in some reported cases, is still a frequent and unfortunate part of Minnesota practice. See, e.g., Hall v. Clifton Precision, 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D. Pa. 1993); Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc., 637 A.2d 34, 51-57 (Del. 1994); Kelvey v. Coughlin, 625 A.2d 775 (R.I. 1993). Rule 30.06 is amended to follow its federal counterpart, retaining the existing mechanism for delivering transcripts of depositions to the lawyer or party noticing the deposition rather than filing them with the court. This difference is necessary because Minn. R. Civ. P. 5.04 does not permit filing discovery in the absence of an order.
Advisory Committee Comment—2006 Amendment
Rule 30.06 is amended only to add subsection titles. This change is made for convenience and consistency with the style of other rules, and is not intended to affect the rule’s interpretation
Advisory Committee Comment—2006 Amendment
Rule 30.07 is amended only to add subsection titles. This change is made for convenience and consistency with the style of other rules, and is not intended to affect the rule’s interpretation
Amendment History
- (Amended effective July 1, 2007.)
- (Amended effective January 1, 2025.)
- (Amended effective January 1, 1997.)
- (Amended effective June 9, 2023.)
- (Amended effective July 1, 2018.)
- (Amended effective January 1, 2006.)
Plain-English Summary
A deposition is a formal interview. One side’s lawyer asks questions, the witness answers under oath, and someone qualified to administer oaths writes down or records everything that is said. Rule 30 covers depositions where the questions are asked out loud, in real time, instead of submitted in writing ahead of time.
Either side can depose almost anyone connected to the case, including the opposing party. Once the lawsuit has started, a party generally does not need the court’s permission to schedule a deposition. The main exception protects a defendant who has recently been sued: a plaintiff normally must wait 30 days after serving the complaint before deposing anyone, unless the defendant has already started taking depositions or asking for discovery. The party who wants to depose someone must give written notice naming the witness, the location, and how the testimony will be recorded, whether that is a written transcript, audio, or video. The party who asks for the deposition also decides whether it happens in person or by remote technology, and pays for the recording.
During the deposition, an officer swears the witness in, and the lawyers question and cross-question the witness much as they would at trial. Objections are allowed, but they must be short and cannot coach the witness toward a particular answer. A lawyer may instruct a witness not to answer only in narrow situations, such as protecting a privilege. A single deposition is capped at one day of seven hours unless the parties agree to more time or a court orders it, and a court can extend that limit if a fair examination requires it or if someone is running out the clock. After the deposition, the witness generally gets a window to review the transcript and note any corrections before it is finalized.
Depositions matter because they lock in a witness’s story early, long before trial, and they let each side see the strength of the other side’s evidence. That preview often shapes decisions about whether to settle a case or take it to trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the other side depose me before I have even filed my answer to the complaint?
Generally yes, once the summons has been served, but if the person suing you wants to depose someone before 30 days have passed since you were served, they usually need the court’s permission first, unless you have already served your own deposition notice or asked for discovery yourself.
How long can a deposition last?
A deposition is limited to one day of seven hours unless everyone agrees to more time or a court orders otherwise. If someone is being obstructive or more time is truly needed for a fair examination, a court can extend the limit and may order the difficult party to pay costs or attorney fees.
Can my lawyer tell me not to answer a question during my deposition?
Only in limited circumstances, such as protecting a legal privilege, enforcing a court-ordered limit on the deposition, or presenting a motion to the court to stop or limit the deposition. Outside those situations, the deposition proceeds and objections are noted for the record.
Does the deposition happen in person or over video?
The party who notices the deposition chooses between in-person and remote technology and must say so in the written notice. If another party disagrees with that choice, the rule requires the parties to talk it over first, and a court will not overturn the chosen format without a good reason.
What happens if the person who requested my deposition does not show up?
If the party who asked for the deposition fails to attend, a court can order them to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, of the party who did show up.
Advisory Committee Comment—2007 Amendment
Rule 30.01 is amended only to delete a reference to a notice procedure in former Rule 30.02(b), which was abrogated in 1996. The amendment merely conforms the rule to the current procedure.