Rule 34.Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes
Last amended July 1, 2018 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 34
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment—2018 Amendments
Rule 34.01 is amended to incorporate the scope of discovery set forth in Rule 26.02. This change is made to make that limitation on the scope of any Rule 34 discovery
obligation clear to litigants, and is not intended to expand or narrow the scope of discovery.
Advisory Committee Comment—2007 Amendment
Rule 34.02 is amended to establish presumptive rules for the procedural aspects of discovery of electrically stored information. These include allowing the party seeking discovery to specify the form or medium for response, providing a default rule that applies if the request does not specify a form, and making it clear that a party does not need to produce information in more than one form.
Advisory Committee Comment—2018 Amendments
Rule 34.02 is amended to adopt the changes made to Federal Rule 34 in 2015. The most significant change is the provision in Rule 34.02(c)(3) that requires a party asserting an objection to a request for production to disclose whether any document is being withheld from production based on those objections. This rule change has curtailed one aspect of game-playing from federal practice and has worked well in federal court. It is adopted in state court practice to accomplish the same purpose. The rule does not require a detailed log of all documents withheld, but the objecting party must make it clear that documents are being withheld based on the objections asserted. This disclosure can then support dialogue over the nature of withheld information and a motion to resolve the appropriateness of the objections asserted. The rule is also reformatted to make it clearer and easier to use by adding subdivisions and headings. These formatting changes are not intended to affect the interpretation of the rule.
Advisory Committee Comment—2018 Amendments
Rule 34.03(a) is a new section that makes clear that Rule 34 requests may be enforced against nonparties through use of subpoenas issued pursuant to Rule 45.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective July 1, 2018.)
- (Amended effective July 1, 2018.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 34 covers requests to see or copy things the other side has, not only paper documents but photos, spreadsheets, emails, recordings, and any other electronically stored information, plus physical objects. It also covers asking to step onto someone else’s land or property to inspect, measure, photograph, or test something connected to the case.
A request can go out as soon as the lawsuit is underway, with no need for court approval first. The request has to describe what is being asked for clearly enough that the other side knows exactly what to look for, and it has to say when, where, and how the inspection or production should happen.
The party who receives the request has 30 days to respond in writing. For each item or category requested, the response must say either that the material will be produced or why the party is objecting. A partial objection does not excuse producing the rest of what was asked for. Instead of letting the other side come inspect items in person, a party can choose to hand over copies instead, and documents are generally handed over either in the order they are normally kept or organized to match the categories in the request.
Rule 34 only reaches parties to the lawsuit. To get documents or access from someone who is not a party, the requesting side has to use a subpoena instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a request for production only cover paper documents?
No. It covers electronically stored information such as emails and data files, along with photographs, recordings, and physical objects, and it can also ask to enter land or property for inspection, measuring, photographing, or testing.
How long does the other party have to respond to a request for production?
30 days after being served, unless the court sets a different deadline.
Can the other party produce copies instead of letting me inspect the originals?
Yes. The rule allows the responding party to state that it will produce copies instead of permitting an in-person inspection.
What happens if the other side objects to only part of my request?
They must specify which part they are objecting to and still allow inspection or production of everything else in that item or category.
Can I use Rule 34 to get documents from someone who is not part of the lawsuit?
Not directly. Rule 34 applies to parties. To reach a non-party’s documents, you generally need a subpoena.
Advisory Committee Comment—2007 Amendment
Rule 34.01 is amended to make two changes. First, the rule explicitly applies to “electronically stored information” (“ESI”) as well as other forms. A more important change is to add provisions allowing the discovering party to require production of information for the purposes of testing or sampling. Testing and sampling are important tools in managing discovery, particularly discovery of ESI. Testing and sampling allow a party to inspect a small subset of requested information to determine whether it is worth conducting additional or broader discovery. These tools may be useful to the court in determining whether to allow additional discovery or discovery of information that is not reasonably accessible, as defined in Rule 26.02(b)(2).