Rule 90.8.Expedited Applications to Compel Correction of Any Error in Redistricting Plan.
Last verified July 6, 2026
In one sentenceRule 90.8 sets the expedited procedure for asking the superior court to compel the Redistricting Board to correct an error in its redistricting plan, on a compressed timeline built to finish well before the next statewide election.
(a)Scope. This rule applies to applications to the superior court under art. VI, sec. 11, Constitution of the State of Alaska, to compel the Redistricting Board to correct any error in its redistricting plan. This rule supersedes the other civil rules to the extent that they may be inconsistent with this rule.
(1)Application to compel the Redistricting Board to correct any error in redistricting must be made within 30 days following the adoption of the final redistricting plan and proclamation by the Redistricting board.
(2)Service of the application shall be made on the Redistricting Board, the Office of the Attorney General, and the Office of the Lieutenant Governor.
(c)Expedited Proceeding. Applications under this rule shall be expedited, and shall have priority over all other matters pending before the court. The date for the court’s decision shall be no later than 120 days prior to the statutory filing deadline for the first statewide election in which the challenged redistricting plan is scheduled to take effect.
(d)Record. The record in the superior court proceeding consists of the record from the Redistricting Board (original papers and exhibits filed before the board and the electronic record or transcript, if any, of the board’s proceedings), as supplemented by such additional evidence as the court, in its discretion, may permit. If the court permits the record to be supplemented by the testimony of one or more witnesses, such testimony may be presented by deposition without regard to the limitations contained in Civil Rule 32(a)(3)(B). A paginated copy of the record from the Redistricting Board shall be filed in the supreme court at the same time it is filed in the superior court.
(e)Scheduling Conference. Within ten days of the application, the assigned judge shall hold a scheduling conference, which all parties must attend. Telephonic participation may be permitted at the judge’s discretion. At the conference, the judge shall enter a scheduling order that addresses all matters appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
(f)Assignment. Cases shall be assigned by presiding judges and may be assigned across judicial district lines in coordination with other presiding judges and the administrative director.
Amendment History
(Adopted by SCO 1457 effective November 15, 2001)
Plain-English Summary
This rule applies to a constitutional challenge asking the superior court to compel the Redistricting Board to correct an error in its plan, and it supersedes any other civil rule that would conflict with it. The application must be filed within 30 days of the Board's final plan and proclamation, and served on the Board, the Attorney General's office, and the Lieutenant Governor's office. These applications take priority over everything else pending before the court, and the decision must issue no later than 120 days before the statutory filing deadline for the first statewide election the challenged plan would govern.
The record consists of the Board's own papers, exhibits, and any electronic record or transcript of its proceedings, supplemented by whatever additional evidence the court allows in its discretion — including deposition testimony taken without the usual limits on using depositions at trial — and a paginated copy of the Board's record is filed with the supreme court at the same time it's filed below. Within 10 days of the application, the assigned judge holds a mandatory scheduling conference (telephonic participation allowed at the judge's discretion) and enters a scheduling order covering whatever the case requires, and cases can be assigned across judicial district lines as the presiding judges and administrative director coordinate.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to challenge a redistricting plan under this rule?
30 days from the Board's adoption of the final plan and proclamation, with the application served on the Redistricting Board, the Attorney General's office, and the Lieutenant Governor's office.
Why does this rule move so much faster than an ordinary civil case?
Because the court's decision has to come no later than 120 days before the statutory filing deadline for the first statewide election the challenged plan would govern, so these applications take priority over everything else on the court's docket.
Can the court consider evidence beyond what was in front of the Redistricting Board?
Yes — the court can supplement the Board's own record with additional evidence in its discretion, including deposition testimony taken without the usual restrictions on using depositions at trial.
Source & verification. The rule text, Amendment History, and Notes are reproduced verbatim from the
official Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure (Alaska R. Civ. P. 90.8). Prescribed by the Supreme Court of Alaska (Alaska Const. art. IV, § 15). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified July 6, 2026. ·
Official source
Also known as:redistricting challenge Alaska ruleRedistricting Board correction AlaskaAlaska R. Civ. P. 90.8