Rule 65.Injunctions.
Last amended January 1, 2019 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65
Amendment History
(Adopted by SCO 5 October 9, 1959; amended by SCO 30 effective February 1, 1961; by SCO 223 effective January 1, 1976; by SCO 258 effective November 15, 1976; by Section 2, Chapter 82, Session Laws of Alaska 1977 effective September 1, 1977; by SCO 708 effective July 15, 1986; by SCO 1153 effective July 15, 1994; by SCO 1269 effective July 15, 1997; by SCO 1361 effective October 15, 1999; by SCO 1620 effective August 16, 2006; and by SCO 1939 effective January 1, 2019)
Notes
Note: AS 10.06.630, as enacted by ch. 166, § 1, SLA 1988, amended Civil Rule 65 by changing the procedure for enjoining dissolution proceedings under AS 10.06.630.
Note: In 1996, the legislature enacted AS 18.66.110– 18.66.130 relating to domestic violence protective orders. According to § 78 ch. 64 SLA 1996, these statutes have the effect of amending Civil Rule 65 relating to temporary restraining orders, the method of obtaining those orders, and the timing of those orders.
Note: Chapter 42 § 2 SLA 1999 enacts AS 09.19.200 which governs the remedies available in civil litigation involving conditions in correctional facilities. According to § 3 of the act, the enactment of AS 09.19.200 has the effect of amending Civil Rules 59(f), 60(b), 62, and 65 by altering the remedies available and the procedure to be used in litigation involving correctional facilities.
Note: Chapter 87 SLA 03 (HB 1) enacted AS 18.65.850- 860, which addresses protective orders for persons who are victims of stalking not involving domestic violence. According to Section 8(b) of the Act, these provisions have the effect of amending Civil Rule 65 relating to temporary restraining orders, the method of obtaining those orders, and the timing of those orders. Note: Chapter 54 SLA 2005 (HB 95) enacted extensive amendments and new provisions related to public health, including public health emergencies and disasters. According to Section 13(d) of the Act, AS 18.15.375(c)(3), (d), and (e), and 18.15.385(d) –(k), enacted in Section 8, have the effect of amending Civil Rule 65 by allowing temporary and ex parte injunctions to be issued and by expediting the procedures related to injunctive relief in matters involving public health.
Note: Chapter 36 SLA 2006 (SB 54) enacted changes to the protective order statutes for crimes involving stalking to include crimes involving sexual assault and sexual abuse. According to section 12 of the Act, the amendments to AS 18.65.850 and AS 18.65.855 made in sections 4 through 8 of the Act have the effect of changing Civil Rule 65 by changing the method for obtaining, and the timing of, temporary restraining orders.
Note: Chapter 65, SLA 2018 (HB 170) enacted comprehensive changes to securities laws. According to section 30(d) of the Act, AS 45.56.655(c), enacted by section 25 of the Act, have the effect of changing Civil Rule 65, effective January 1, 2019, by changing the procedure for injunctions in certain cases and by prohibiting requiring the administrator (in the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development) to post a bond. Cross References CROSS REFERENCE: AS 09.40.230
Plain-English Summary
A preliminary injunction can't issue without notice to the other side, though the court can move the trial itself up and combine it with the injunction hearing, and any evidence taken at that hearing that would also be admissible at trial becomes part of the trial record without having to be repeated — done in a way that preserves whatever jury trial rights the parties have. A temporary restraining order is different: it can issue without notice, but only on a specific showing of immediate and irreparable harm and a certification of what efforts were made to give notice. A TRO issued without notice has to spell out why it was granted that way, expires within 10 days unless extended or the restrained party agrees to longer, and pushes the case straight to a hearing on a preliminary injunction, which takes priority over most other business on the court's calendar. The restrained party can also ask, on two days' notice, to have the TRO dissolved or modified sooner.
Except for the state, a municipality, or a domestic relations case (unless the court orders otherwise), anyone who gets a restraining order or injunction has to post security to cover the costs and damages of a party later found to have been wrongfully restrained — and a surety on that bond submits to the court's jurisdiction and can be pursued by motion rather than a separate lawsuit. Every order has to state its reasons, describe the restrained conduct in specific terms rather than by reference to the complaint, and it binds only the parties, their officers, agents, and attorneys, plus anyone in active concert with them who gets actual notice.
Rule 65 also creates a standing injunction that a judicial district's presiding judge can put in place for most domestic relations actions — dissolutions, domestic violence cases, and interstate support enforcement cases are excluded — automatically barring either party from removing a child from Alaska without the other's written consent, disposing of marital property without consent (beyond ordinary living expenses), or threatening or harassing the other party. It takes effect against a party as soon as that party or their attorney receives a copy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a judge issue a restraining order without telling the other side first?
Only on a specific showing that immediate and irreparable harm will happen before the other side can be heard, along with a certification of what notice efforts were made. Even then the order expires within 10 days unless extended, and it must be followed quickly by a noticed hearing on a preliminary injunction.
Do I have to put up money to get an injunction?
Generally yes — the applicant posts security for costs and damages in case the restrained party turns out to have been wrongfully enjoined. The state, a municipality, and (unless the court orders otherwise) domestic relations cases are exempt.
Is there an injunction that applies automatically once I file for divorce?
In most domestic relations actions other than dissolutions, domestic violence cases, and interstate support enforcement cases, the presiding judge can put a standing injunction in place barring either party from removing a child from Alaska, disposing of marital property, or threatening the other party without consent, effective once that party receives a copy.