Rule 58.Entry of Judgment.
Last amended October 15, 2002 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 58
Amendment History
(Adopted by SCO 5 October 9, 1959; amended by SCO 258 effective November 15, 1976; by SCO 554 effective April 4, 1983; by SCO 1281 effective August 7, 1997; by SCO 1295 effective January 15, 1998; by SCO 1415 effective October 15, 2000; and by SCO 1482 effective October 15, 2002)
Notes
Note: Ch. 139, Sec. 1. SLA 1986, enacted AS 09.17.040 and AS 09.17.080 regarding awards of damages for personal injury and the apportionment of damages. According to Section 7 of the Act, AS 09.17.040 and AS 09.17.080 have the effect of amending Civil Rule 58. AS 09.17.040 requires verdicts to include an itemization between economic and non- economic losses, and allows for periodic payment in certain circumstances. AS 09.17.080, as amended, requires special interrogatories or finding on the amount to damages and percentages of fault, and requires that judgment be entered against each liable party on the basis of several liability.
Note: Ch. 26, sec. 10, SLA 1997 repeals and reenacts AS 09.17.020 concerning punitive damages. New AS 09.17.020(j) requires that 50 percent of an award of punitive damages be deposited in the state general fund. This provision applies to causes of action accruing on or after August 7, 1997. See ch. 26, sec. 55, SLA 1997. According to sec. 49 of the Act, new AS 09.17.020(j) has the effect of amending Civil Rule 58 by requiring the court to order that a certain percentage of an award of punitive damages be deposited into the general fund.
Note: Ch. 26, sec. 19, SLA 1997 amends AS 09.30.070 by adding subsection (c) concerning prejudgment interest on awards of future economic damages, future noneconomic damages, and punitive damages. This provision applies to causes of action accruing on or after August 7, 1997. See ch. 26, sec. 55, SLA 1997. According to sec. 53 of the Act, new AS 09.30.070(c) has the effect of amending Civil Rule 58 by providing that prejudgment interest may not be awarded for future economic or noneconomic damages or punitive damages.
Note: Sections 41, 43, 45, and 46 of chapter 87 SLA 1997 amend AS 25.20.050(n), AS 25.24.160(d), AS 25.24.210(e), and AS 25.24.230(i), respectively, to require that an order or acknowledgement of paternity, a divorce decree, a petition for dissolution of marriage, and a dissolution decree include the social security number of each party to the action and each child whose rights are being addressed. According to § 151 of the Act, these provisions have the effect of amending Civil Rules 52, 58, 78, and 90.1 by requiring the court to include social security numbers, if ascertainable, of parties and children in certain petitions, pleadings, and judgments.
Plain-English Summary
Once a jury returns a general verdict, or the court decides a party should recover only a fixed sum or costs, or that all relief should be denied, the court or clerk enters judgment right away; when the court grants some other kind of relief, or the jury returns a special verdict or a general verdict with interrogatory answers, the court enters judgment promptly once that's resolved. Every judgment has to stand as its own separate document, apart from any findings, conclusions, opinion, or memorandum the court has issued, and entering it can't be delayed, nor the appeal deadline extended, just because costs or attorney's fees haven't been decided yet. A judgment for money has to follow the form a separate rule requires.
Several Alaska statutes have amended how judgments get entered in specific kinds of cases — requiring itemized findings on damages and fault allocation in personal-injury and multi-party-fault cases, directing that half of any punitive-damages award go to the state's general fund, and limiting when prejudgment interest can be awarded on future or punitive damages.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a judgment have to be its own document, separate from the court's opinion?
Yes — Rule 58 requires every judgment to be set out on its own separate document, apart from any findings, conclusions, opinion, or memorandum.
Can entry of judgment be delayed until the court decides costs or attorney's fees?
No — entry of judgment, and the start of the appeal deadline, can't be delayed for the taxing of costs or an award of fees.
Does Alaska law require special treatment for punitive damages in a judgment?
Yes — state law requires that 50 percent of a punitive damages award be deposited into the state's general fund, among other statutory requirements affecting how judgments in these cases are entered.