Rule 45.1.Interstate Depositions and Discovery.
Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 45.1
Amendment History
(Adopted by SCO 1853 effective October 15, 2015)
Notes
NOTE: This rule is derived from the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act. In applying and construing this rule, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it. Reference to the uniform act and its commentary is appropriate when applying and construing this rule.
Plain-English Summary
A party holding a subpoena issued by a court in another state, the District of Columbia, a U.S. territory, or a federally recognized tribe can submit it to the clerk of any Alaska judicial district to obtain discovery here; doing so doesn't count as appearing in an Alaska court. The clerk promptly issues an Alaska subpoena that carries over the terms of the original one and includes contact information for all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties, and it's served the same way as any other Alaska subpoena. Once issued, the deposition and discovery proceed under Alaska's own discovery rules, and any request for a protective order, or to enforce, quash, or modify the subpoena, goes to the Alaska court that issued it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an out-of-state subpoena be used to take a deposition in Alaska?
Yes — a party submits the foreign subpoena to the clerk of any Alaska judicial district, who issues a corresponding Alaska subpoena for service.
Does submitting an out-of-state subpoena in Alaska count as appearing in Alaska court?
No, Rule 45.1 specifically says it doesn't.
Which court decides a dispute over an interstate discovery subpoena?
The Alaska court location from which the subpoena was issued handles any application to enforce, quash, modify, or get a protective order.