Rule 67.Deposit in Court
Last amended July 1, 1998 · Last verified July 2, 2026
Full Text of Rule 67
Advisory Commission Comments
Advisory Commission Comments [2012].
The 1998 Comment is clarified, and an erroneous cross-reference in that Comment to "Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14- 222" is corrected to "Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-121."
Amendment History
- As amended by order effective July 1, 1998.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 67.01 lets a party in a case seeking a money judgment, or the disposition of money or other deliverable property, deposit all or part of the disputed sum or thing with the court, on notice to every other party and with the court’s permission. This voluntary deposit shows up most often in interpleader cases, where a stakeholder wants to rid itself of a disputed fund and step out of the middle of a fight between rival claimants, but the depositing party does not have to disclaim every interest in what it deposits to use the rule.
Rule 67.02 covers a different situation: when a party’s own pleadings or testimony admit that it holds money or property belonging to, or held in trust for, someone else, the court can order that money or property deposited with the court or delivered to the rightful party, with or without security, and can direct the sheriff or another officer to carry that order out. Because this involuntary route bypasses the more demanding showing that statutes governing attachment or sequestration would otherwise require, courts have pushed back when a party tries to use it without an admission of holding someone else’s property — ordering a deposit based on a bare allegation of ownership, rather than an actual admission, has been reversed on appeal.
Rule 67.03 directs that money paid into court be deposited in a designated bank or savings institution to the court’s credit, disbursed only by the clerk’s check under court order, and it relieves a depositing party of further interest liability on the deposited sum once the deposit is made. Rule 67.04 makes clear the rule has no bearing on post-judgment interest — a defendant cannot stop post-judgment interest from accruing by depositing the judgment amount into the court registry, particularly where the deposit skips the notice and leave-of-court steps Rule 67.01 requires. Because Tennessee’s post-judgment interest rate is fixed by statute rather than tied to a deposit account’s actual return, and because nothing in the rule requires deposited funds to be placed somewhere interest-bearing, a technically compliant deposit can still leave a prevailing party short of what the interest statute is meant to provide.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party deposit disputed funds with the court on its own?
Not unilaterally. Rule 67.01 requires notice to every other party and the court’s leave before a party may deposit money or property that is the subject of the action.
Can a court order a party to deposit property it admits belongs to someone else?
Yes. Rule 67.02 lets the court order deposit or delivery of money or property a party has admitted, through its pleadings or testimony, that it holds for another party, though courts have reversed orders based on a bare allegation rather than an actual admission.
Does depositing a judgment amount into the court stop post-judgment interest from running?
Not necessarily. Rule 67.04 makes clear the rule does not affect post-judgment interest, and a deposit that skips the notice and leave-of-court requirements of Rule 67.01 will not stop interest from accruing.
Advisory Commission Comments [1998].
The losing defendant cannot avoid post-judgment interest due under Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-121 by depositing the verdict amount into the trial court clerk's office.