Rule 48.Juries of Less Than Twelve: Majority Verdict
Last verified July 2, 2026
Full Text of Rule 48
Plain-English Summary
Rule 48 is a single sentence that hands control to the parties themselves: they may stipulate that the jury will have fewer members than the number the law otherwise calls for, or that a verdict — or a finding on a particular issue — reached by a stated majority of jurors will count as the jury’s verdict or finding, instead of requiring every juror to agree.
Tennessee’s constitutional jury right ordinarily means a twelve-person jury reaching a unanimous verdict, a stricter baseline than many other systems use. Rule 48 lets the parties depart from that baseline by agreement, whether to save time and expense with a smaller panel, to make a lingering holdout less likely to force a mistrial, or both. Because the departure requires a stipulation, neither side can be forced into a smaller jury or a majority-verdict rule without agreeing to it.
The rule fits alongside Rule 47.02, which lets a court seat one or more additional jurors precisely because Tennessee ordinarily requires all twelve jurors to stay through deliberations — a structural need Rule 48 lets the parties bypass by agreeing in advance to proceed with fewer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Tennessee civil jury have fewer than twelve members?
Yes, if the parties stipulate to it. Rule 48 lets the parties agree to a jury smaller than the number ordinarily required by law.
Does a jury verdict have to be unanimous?
Only unless the parties agree otherwise. Rule 48 lets the parties stipulate that a verdict reached by a stated majority of jurors will count as the jury’s verdict, instead of requiring unanimity.
Can one side force the other into a smaller jury under Rule 48?
No. Rule 48 operates only by stipulation, meaning both sides have to agree before the jury size or the verdict requirement can depart from the ordinary rules.