Rule 28.Persons Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken
Last amended July 1, 2002 · Last verified July 2, 2026
Full Text of Rule 28
Advisory Commission Comments
Advisory Commission Comments [1996].
A lawyer or agent can operate the equipment at a videotaped deposition.
Advisory Commission Comments [2002].
The cited statute, Tenn. Code Ann. § 24-9-136, adequately covers disqualification of court reporters, so the earlier rule was deleted.
Amendment History
- As amended July 1, 1979.
- by order effective July 1, 1996.
- and by order filed January 31, 2002, effective July 1, 2002.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 28.01 covers depositions taken within the United States or its territories: they must be taken before someone authorized to administer oaths under federal law or the law of the place where the examination occurs, or before a person the court appoints for that purpose, who then has the power to administer oaths and take testimony. In a videotaped deposition, any lawyer or a lawyer's agent may operate the recording equipment.
Rule 28.02 addresses depositions taken in a foreign country, which may proceed on notice before someone authorized to administer oaths under that country's law or under United States law, before a person the court commissions for the purpose, or under a letter rogatory. Neither a commission nor a letter rogatory requires a showing that taking the deposition another way would be impracticable or inconvenient, and both may be used in the same case where appropriate. A notice or commission can identify the presiding person by name or by descriptive title, and a letter rogatory may be addressed to the appropriate authority in the country involved. Evidence obtained through a letter rogatory is not excluded merely because it lacks a verbatim transcript, was not taken under oath, or otherwise departs from the requirements that apply to depositions taken within the United States.
Rule 28.03 points to a Tennessee statute governing disqualification of the person presiding over a deposition for interest or conflict — among other things, that statute disqualifies parties, party attorneys, close relatives, employees of a party or its attorney, and anyone with a recent personal relationship or financial stake connected to the case. Because that statute gives a party 30 days to elect to void a deposition based on the presiding officer's disqualification, while depositions generally require any qualification objection to be raised before or promptly after the deposition itself, a party relying on one deadline without regard to the other risks losing the objection entirely.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is allowed to preside over a deposition taken in Tennessee?
Rule 28.01 allows a deposition to be taken before anyone authorized to administer oaths under federal law or the law of the place where the deposition happens, or before a person the court specifically appoints for that purpose.
What are the options for taking a deposition in a foreign country?
Rule 28.02 allows three approaches: on notice before someone authorized to administer oaths in that country or under United States law, before a person the court commissions, or through a letter rogatory addressed to the appropriate foreign authority.
Can a deposition be challenged because the person presiding had a conflict of interest?
Yes. Rule 28.03 points to a Tennessee statute disqualifying certain presiding officers for interest or conflict, though objections based on disqualification must generally be raised promptly, since the statute's own election window can conflict with the deposition rules' timing requirements.
Advisory Commission Comments.
Rule 28.01 allows a deposition to be taken before any officer authorized by federal, state, or territorial law to administer oaths. The provisions of Rule 28.02 governing depositions taken in foreign countries are new to Tennessee law.