Rule 4012.Protective Orders.
Last amended October 24, 2003 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4012
Plain-English Summary
This rule is the tool for controlling abusive or intrusive discovery. On motion by a party or the person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause, the court may enter any order justice requires — that the discovery not be had at all; that it proceed only on specified terms as to time and place; that it use a different method; that certain matters not be inquired into; that its scope be limited; that it occur with only designated persons present; that a deposition be sealed; or that a trade secret or other confidential information not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way.
During a deposition, the court may on motion order the examination halted or limited. The protective order lets the court tailor discovery to prevent harassment while preserving legitimate inquiry.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you stop improper discovery?
By moving for a protective order and showing good cause; the court may prohibit, limit, or set terms on the discovery.
What can a protective order do?
Prohibit the discovery, limit its scope or method, set terms, seal a deposition, or protect trade secrets and confidential information.
Official Note
Official Note: Motions for a protective order are governed by the motion rules, Rule 208.1 et seq. A court of common pleas, by local rule numbered Local Rule 208.2(e), may require that the motion contain a certification that counsel has conferred or attempted to confer with all interested parties in order to resolve the matter without court action.
Explanatory Note Under the prior practice, protective orders were available in depositions or discovery on oral examination (Rule 4012) or on written interrogatories (Rule 4004(e)). They were not specifically included in interrogatories to parties (Rule 4005) or in general discovery (Rule 4007). The amend- ment provides a comprehensive Rule which covers all depositions and all discovery. This follows Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(c). The eight subdivisions of prior Rule 4012(a) remain, with stylistic changes which broaden their scope. No major change is made in principle. A new ninth subdivision is added, transposing the pro- visions of former Rule 4011(c) dealing with trade secrets, research and development. The nine sub- divisions are defined as examples of the broad principle of protecting against ‘‘unreasonable annoy- ance, embarrassment, oppression, burden or expense.’’ The power of the court should be adequate to furnish any needed protection. A self-explanatory clause is added at the end of subdivision (a) empowering the court, if it denies the protective order, to order that discovery go forward. The amendment permits a simple motion procedure for a protective order. This is not necessarily the exclusive procedure for obtaining relief. The various forms of protective order authorized by the Rule can be included by the court in orders entered at other stages of the litigation, if appropriate. For example, a stay of all proceedings will automatically block any pending or prospective discovery. The last sentence of former subdivision (b) is deleted, since all provisions for expenses and attor- neys’ fees as sanctions are consolidated in Rule 4019, infra.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 4012 amended November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979, 8 Pa.B. 3551; amended October 24, 2003, effective 9 months after the date of the Order, 33 Pa.B. 5506. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (243960) to (243961) and (255409).