Rule 4003.4.Scope of Discovery. Trial Preparation Material. Statements.
Adopted November 20, 1978 · Last amended December 27, 1995 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4003.4
Plain-English Summary
This rule gives a person special access to their own statement. Upon written request, a party is entitled to immediate receipt of a copy of a statement concerning the action or its subject matter that the person previously made — either a written statement the person signed or otherwise adopted, or a substantially verbatim recording or transcript of the person’s oral statement.
Because a person’s own words can be used against them, the rule lets them obtain a copy without the heightened showing that other trial-preparation material requires. The Explanatory Note notes that the rule resolved a problem the prior practice left unaddressed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you get a copy of a statement you gave?
Yes. On written request, a person is entitled to a copy of their own signed or substantially verbatim recorded statement.
What counts as a statement?
A written statement the person signed or adopted, or a substantially verbatim recording or transcript of the person's oral statement.
Official Note
Explanatory Note Rule 4003.4 resolves a problem not covered in the prior practice, and which has troubled the courts. It provides that any party may, upon request, obtain from his opponent a copy of the party’s own statement or the statement of any witness in the possession of the opponent. Further, any witness may obtain a copy of his own statement upon request. If refused, the party or witness may move for a court order for compliance. The Rule differs markedly in scope from Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(b)(3). The Federal Rule permits a party to obtain only his own statement; the production of statements of witnesses obtained by an adverse party in anticipation of litigation or preparation for trial requires a showing of substantial need in the preparation of the inquiring party’s case and that he is unable without undue hardship to obtain a sub- stantial equivalent of the materials by other means. There are no restrictions on the timing of the request. Under prior practice, some lower courts ruled that the statement of a party given to his opponent could be withheld until after the party had testi- fied. Others held that the party could demand a copy of his statement before he testified. Some held that no witness could have a copy of his own statement because this would prevent a test of his veracity. The amended Rule does not deal with the substantive problem of admissibility in evidence or use of the statements. Their admissibility is governed by the rules of evidence. Two statutes are relevant. Section 7101 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 7101, prohibits the use of statements obtained from an injured person within fifteen days of admission to a hospital or sani- tarium, unless he acknowledges before an independent notary public his willingness to give the state- ment. Likewise, the Peer Review Protection Act of 1974, 63 P. S. § 425.1 et seq., imposes restrictions on discovery and use of the proceedings and records of health care peer review organizations for the pur- pose of evaluating the quality of health care. The Rule covers all forms of statements, including signed statements, recordings and transcriptions.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 4003.4 adopted November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979, 8 Pa.B. 3551, amended December 14, 1979, effective January 5, 1980, 10 Pa.B. 34; amended December 27, 1995, effective January 1, 1996, 26 Pa.B. 227. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (134399) to (134400).