Adopted August 30, 1965 · Last amended August 30, 1965 · Last verified June 30, 2026
In one sentenceOn a party's petition, after notice and hearing, the court may review the prothonotary's action on the security, raise or lower a bond, require more for cause, strike an improperly filed bond, or allow a substitute.
(4)permit the substitution of a bond and enter an exoneration of a prior bond.
Plain-English Summary
This rule is the court’s check on the interpleader bonds. On a party’s petition, after notice and a hearing, the court may review whether the prothonotary was right to approve or reject the security, increase or decrease the amount of a bond or require additional security for cause, strike a bond that was improperly filed, or permit substitution of a new bond and exonerate the old one.
Because the bonds set at double the property’s value carry real consequences for both the claimant and the creditor, the rule lets either side ask the court to correct the security if it is wrong.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an interpleader bond be challenged?
Yes. On petition, after notice and hearing, the court may review, adjust, strike, or allow substitution of the bond.
Who may object to the bond?
Any party may petition the court.
Official Note
Official Note: Adopted August 30, 1965, effective March 1, 1966.
Source & verification. Rule text, the Official Note, and the amendment
history are reproduced verbatim from the Pennsylvania Code, Title 231, the official compilation
of rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Last verified June 30, 2026. ·
Official text
Also known as:objection to bond interpleaderchallenge interpleader bond