Rule 3145.Interrogatories; procedure.
Adopted March 30, 1960 · Last amended April 12, 1999 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3145
Plain-English Summary
This rule treats the garnishment exchange like ordinary pleadings. The interrogatories function as a complaint and the garnishee’s answer as an answer, so far as practicable.
In the answer’s new matter, the garnishee may include the defenses of immunity or exemption of property, any defense or counterclaim it could assert against the defendant if sued by the defendant, and any claim it could assert against the plaintiff if sued by the plaintiff.
One limit matters: the garnishee may not assert a defense on the defendant’s behalf against the plaintiff or otherwise attack the validity of the attachment through these defenses.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the garnishment dispute litigated?
As far as practicable, the interrogatories are treated as a complaint and the garnishee’s answer as an answer in a civil action.
What can the garnishee raise in its answer?
Exemption or immunity of property, its own defenses or counterclaims against the defendant, and claims it could assert against the plaintiff.
Official Note
Official Note: Objections to the attachment, other than the defenses of immunity or exemp- tion, must be raised preliminarily. See Rule 3142.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 3145 adopted March 30, 1960, effective November 1, 1960; amended December 16, 1983, effective July 1, 1984, 13 Pa.B. 3999; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999, 29 Pa.B. 2281. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (243922).