Rule 2312.Questions of Jurisdiction.
Adopted July 10, 1939 · Last amended December 16, 1983 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2312
Plain-English Summary
Interpleader borrows the ordinary tools for threshold challenges. Questions of jurisdiction, and of the form or sufficiency of any pleading, are raised in the same manner as in a civil action. No separate motion or procedure applies because the case is an interpleader.
In a civil action those questions come up by preliminary objection under Rule 1028, which lists grounds such as lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or the person of the defendant, failure of a pleading to conform to law or rule of court, and legal insufficiency of a pleading. The interpleader chapter uses civil-action forms elsewhere too: a claimant’s statement is framed and verified like a complaint under Rule 2309(b), and answers follow civil-action form under Rule 2310(c).
Frequently Asked Questions
How are jurisdiction or pleading defects raised in an interpleader?
The same way as in an ordinary civil action.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 2312 adopted July 10, 1939, effective January 22, 1940; amended through December 16, 1983, effective July 1, 1984, 13 Pa.B. 3999. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (22355).