Rule 2303.Allegations Required in Petition. Stay of Proceedings.
Adopted July 10, 1939 · Last amended April 12, 1999 · Last verified June 30, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2303
Plain-English Summary
An interpleader petition must show the defendant truly faces double exposure. This rule requires the petition to allege four things, chief among them that a claimant not a party of record has made or is expected to make a demand on the defendant for the same money or property; the petition must also allege good faith and no collusion, state the defendant’s own interest and ability to pay or deliver the rest into court, and disclose any admitted claim or independent liability. The rule provides for staying the underlying action while the interpleader is decided — protecting the defendant from inconsistent demands.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must an interpleader petition allege?
Four things: that a non-party claimant has made or is expected to make a competing demand on the defendant for the same money or property; that the petition is filed in good faith and not in collusion; what interest the defendant claims and whether it can pay or deliver the rest into court; and whether the defendant has admitted a claim or taken on independent liability. The petition must also be signed and verified.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 2303 adopted July 10, 1939, effective January 22, 1940; amended April 18, 1975, effective immediately, 5 Pa.B. 1820; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999, 29 Pa.B. 2274. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (190606).