Rule 1920.52.Hearing by the Court. Decision. No Post-trial Relief. Decree.
Adopted June 27, 1980 · Last amended July 30, 2018 · Last verified June 30, 2026
In one sentenceRule 1920.52 governs how the court decides contested divorce and economic claims, bars post-trial motions in the matters it specifies, and provides for the decree.
(4)a contested action of divorce or for annulment, the order of the court shall state the reasons for its decision. A motion for post- trial relief may not be filed to orders with the actions or claims enumerated in this subdivision.
(5)an uncontested action of divorce or annulment; or
(6)protection from abuse, the order of the court may set forth only general findings. A motion for post-trial relief may not be filed to orders with the actions or claims enumerated in this subdivision.
(c)The court need not determine all claims at one time but may enter a decree adjudicating a specific claim or claims. However, unless by agreement of the parties, no bifurcated decree of divorce shall be entered except as set forth in 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 3323(c.1). In any bifurcated decree entered by the court without the agreement of the parties, the court shall state with specificity the compelling circumstances that exist for the entry of the decree and the economic provisions sufficient to protect the non-moving party.
(d)In all cases the court shall enter a decree separately adjudicating each claim raised.
Plain-English Summary
This rule shapes the end of a contested divorce. For claims involving marital property, marital agreements, alimony, or a contested divorce or annulment, it sets how the court enters its order and decree. It bars post-trial relief in the matters it specifies, routing any challenge to appeal, so the divorce decree and economic rulings reach finality.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a divorce decision be challenged by a post-trial motion?
In the matters this rule specifies, no; review is by appeal.
Official Note
Official Note: The procedure relating to motions for reconsideration is set forth in Rule 1930.2.
Explanatory Comment. —2010 The Divorce Code was amended in 2004 to make it more difficult for the court to enter a bifur- cated divorce decree absent the agreement of the parties. Section 3323(c.1) became effective on Janu- ary 28, 2005 and limits the circumstances in which the court may enter a bifurcated decree, requiring the establishment of grounds for divorce, compelling circumstances for the entry of the decree and sufficient economic protections for the non-moving party.
Amendment History
The provisions of this Rule 1920.52 adopted June 27, 1980, effective July 1, 1980, 10 Pa.B. 2967; amended July 22, 1983, effective July 1, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 2254; amended October 19, 1983, effective January 1, 1984, 13 Pa.B. 3629; amended March 23, 1987, effective July 1, 1987, 17 Pa.B. 1499; amended May 17, 1991, effective July 1, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 2615; amended March 30, 1994, effective July 1, 1994, 24 Pa.B. 1941; amended May 31, 2000, effective July 1, 2000, 30 Pa.B. 3155; amended July 8, 2010, effective September 6, 2010, 40 Pa.B. 4140; amended July 30, 2018, effective January 1, 2019, 48 Pa.B. 4960. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (384539) to (384540).
Source & verification. Rule text, the Official Note, and the amendment
history are reproduced verbatim from the Pennsylvania Code, Title 231, the official compilation
of rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Last verified June 30, 2026. ·
Official text
Also known as:divorce decreecontested divorce decisionno post-trial relief divorce