RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 1915.7.Consent Order.

Last amended June 3, 2019 · Last verified June 30, 2026

In one sentenceRule 1915.7 lets the court enter a consent custody order when the parties agree, on the terms the rule requires.

Full Text of Rule 1915.7

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

If the parties have an agreement regarding custody and request that the court enter a consent order incorporating the agreement’s terms:
(a) the parties shall submit to the court a proposed custody order bearing the parties’ written consent; or
(b) the parties may state the agreement on the record, provided that:
(1) within ten days of placing the agreement on the record, the parties comply with subdivision (a); or
(2) the court memorializes the oral agreement from the record into a writ- ten custody order.

Plain-English Summary

Many custody disputes end in agreement. This rule lets the parties ask the court to enter a consent order incorporating the terms they have agreed on, following the requirements the rule sets. A consent order gives the agreement the force of a court order, enforceable like any other custody order.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can parents agree on custody and have the court make it an order?

Yes. The court may enter a consent order incorporating the parties' agreement.

Official Note

Official Note: See Pa.R.C.P. No. 1930.1(b). This rule may require attorneys or unrepre- sented parties to file confidential documents and documents containing confidential information that are subject to the Case Records Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania. See Pa.R.C.P. No. 1915.10(b) regarding written custody order requirements.

Explanatory Comment. —2019 The rule has been amended to ensure that when a custody agreement is orally placed on the record that a written custody order prepared by the parties memorializing the parties’ agreement is timely submitted to the court or the court memorializes the oral agreement into a written custody order. The amendment avoids the untenable circumstance that the only written record of the parties’ oral agree- ment is a transcription of what had been placed on the record. Transcription agreements are often cumbersome and difficult to discern as to the custody terms and provisions, which makes enforcement difficult. This amendment is consistent with the holding in R.L.P. v. R.F.M., 110 A.3d 201 (Pa. Super. 2015).

Amendment History

The provisions of this Rule 1915.7 amended November 8, 1982, effective January 1, 1983, 12 Pa.B. 4040; amended August 1, 2013, effective September 3, 2013, 43 Pa.B. 4702; amended January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018, 48 Pa.B. 477; amended June 1, 2018, effective July 1, 2018, 48Pa.B. 3520; amended June 3, 2019, effective October 1, 2019, 49 Pa.B. 3058. Immediately preced- ing text appears at serial page (392633).

Source & verification. Rule text, the Official Note, and the amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Pennsylvania Code, Title 231, the official compilation of rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Last verified June 30, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: custody consent orderagreed custody ordercustody agreement