Rule 46.Exceptions Unnecessary
Last amended July 1, 1975 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 46
Amendment History
Effective Date: July 1, 1970
Amended: July 1, 1975
Plain-English Summary
Under older practice, a party who wanted to challenge a court's ruling on appeal had to take a formal exception to the ruling in addition to objecting to it. Rule 46 abolishes that extra step. Once a matter has been brought to the court's attention -- by objection, by motion, or in any other way -- and the court has ruled on it, no further exception is needed to preserve the issue for appellate review.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was an exception under the older practice Rule 46 replaced?
A separate, formal step a party had to take after objecting to a ruling, on top of the objection itself, in order to preserve the issue for appeal.
What does a party need to do now to preserve an issue for appeal?
Bring the matter to the court's attention by objection, motion, or some other means, and obtain a ruling. No additional exception is required.
Does Rule 46 excuse a party from objecting at all?
No. It only eliminates the old formal exception that used to follow an objection or ruling -- a party still has to raise the issue and get a ruling to preserve it.