Rule 4.7.Process: Waiving Service
Last amended July 2024 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4.7
Amendment History
Effective Date: July 1, 2020
Amended: July 1, 2022; July 2024
Staff Note (July 1, 2020 Amendment)
Rule 4.7 is based on the federal rule permitting waiver of service. Paragraph (A) states what the present rule implies: the defendant has a duty to avoid costs associated with the service of a summons not needed to inform the defendant regarding the commencement of an action. The text of the rule also sets forth the requirements for a Notice and Request for Waiver sufficient to put the cost-shifting provision in place. These requirements are illustrated in the forms appended to the rule. Pursuant to Rule 4(D), only those persons who are identified in Rule 4.2 and who are eighteen years of age or older and not under a disability may waive service. Paragraph (A)(7) permits the use of alternatives to the United States mails in sending the Notice and Request. While private messenger services or electronic communications may be more expensive than the mail, they may be equally reliable and on occasion more convenient to the parties. Especially with respect to transmissions to foreign countries, alternative means may be desirable, for in some countries facsimile transmission or electronic mail are the most efficient and economical means of communication. If electronic means such as facsimile transmission or electronic mail are employed, the sender should maintain a record of the transmission to assure proof of transmission if receipt is denied, but a party receiving such a transmission has a duty to cooperate and cannot avoid liability for the resulting cost of formal service if the transmission is prevented at the point of receipt.
A defendant failing to comply with a request for waiver shall be given an opportunity to show good cause for the failure, which is the case under paragraph (B), but sufficient cause should be rare. It is not a good cause for failure to waive service that the claim is unjust or that the court lacks jurisdiction. Sufficient cause not to shift the cost of service would exist, however, if the defendant did not receive the request or was insufficiently literate in English to understand it. It should be noted that the provisions for shifting the cost of service apply only if the defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction.
Paragraph (C) is a cost-shifting provision. The costs that may be imposed on the defendant could include, for example, the cost of the time of a process server required to make contact with a defendant residing in a guarded apartment house or residential development. The paragraph is explicit that the costs of enforcing the cost-shifting provision are themselves recoverable from a defendant who fails to return the waiver. In the absence of such a provision, the purpose of the rule would be frustrated by the cost of its enforcement, which is likely to be high in relation to the small benefit secured by the plaintiff.
Paragraph (D) extends the time for answer if, before being served with process, the defendant waives formal service. The extension is intended to serve as an inducement to waive service and to assure that a defendant will not gain any delay by declining to waive service and thereby causing the additional time needed to effect service. By waiving service, a defendant is not called upon to respond to the complaint until 60 days from the date the notice was sent to it—90 days if the notice was sent to a foreign country— rather than within the 28-day period from date of service specified in Rule 12.
Paragraph (E) clarifies the effective date of service when service is waived. The device of requested waiver of service is not suitable if a limitations period which is about to expire is not tolled by filing the action. Unless there is ample time, the plaintiff should proceed directly to the formal methods for service identified in Rules 4-4.6.
The procedure of requesting waiver of service should also not be used if the time for service under Rule 4(E) will expire before the date on which the waiver must be returned. The court could refuse a request for additional time unless the plaintiff can demonstrate good cause as to why service was not made within that period. It may be noted that the presumptive time limit for service under Rule 4(E) does not apply to out-of-state service or service in a foreign country.
Paragraph (F) of Rule 4.7 is explicit that a timely waiver of service of a summons does not prejudice the right of a defendant to object by means of a motion authorized by Rule 12(B) to the absence of jurisdiction, or to assert improper venue under Rule 12(B)(3). The only issues eliminated are those involving the sufficiency of the summons or the sufficiency of the method by which it is served.
Staff Note (July 1, 2022 Amendment)
Division (B) is amended to eliminate this method of service for domestic relations cases as well as civil protection order cases. The additional time required to obtain a waiver, and the automatic extension of Answer Day interject too much delay in these categories of cases.
Staff Note (July 1, 2024, Amendment)
Division (B) of this rule is amended with Civ.R. 4(D) to clarify that service of summons may be waived in any type of action. No substantive change is intended. The signature blocks of the forms are amended to promote clarity.
Plain-English Summary
Effective in 2020 and modeled on a similar federal practice, division (A) lets a plaintiff send an individual, corporation, partnership, or association a written request to waive service, so long as the request meets seven conditions: it is addressed as Rule 4.2 requires, names the court, comes with the complaint and two copies of the waiver form plus a prepaid way to return it, explains the consequences of waiving or not waiving, states the date it was sent, gives the defendant at least twenty-eight days to respond (sixty if the defendant is outside the United States), and is sent by first-class mail or another reliable means.
Division (B) limits this option to civil actions in the courts of common pleas and excludes petitions for orders under Rule 65.1 and, since 2022, domestic relations matters, where the extra time a waiver adds was found to slow cases down too much. If a defendant who is subject to the court’s jurisdiction fails, without good cause, to sign and return a requested waiver, division (C) lets the court make that defendant pay both the expenses of completing service later and the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, of any motion needed to collect them.
A defendant who timely returns a waiver gets sixty days after the request was sent to answer — ninety if the request went abroad — instead of the usual twenty-eight, under division (D). Division (E) treats a filed waiver as though the summons and complaint had been served on the date of filing, so no separate proof of service is required. Division (F) preserves the defendant’s right to contest personal jurisdiction or venue despite having waived service itself. The rule also appends the official notice and waiver forms sent to defendants.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a request to waive service include?
Seven things: proper addressing under Rule 4.2, the name of the court, a copy of the complaint with two copies of the waiver form and a prepaid return method, an explanation of the consequences of waiving or not, the date sent, a response deadline of at least twenty-eight days (sixty if sent abroad), and delivery by first-class mail or another reliable means.
What happens if a defendant refuses to sign a waiver without good cause?
The court may require that defendant to pay the expenses later incurred in completing service and the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, of any motion needed to collect those service expenses.
Does waiving service of summons waive a defendant’s other defenses?
No. Rule 4.7(F) preserves every objection to personal jurisdiction and venue. A defendant who waives service can still raise those defenses in a timely responsive pleading or motion.