Rule 65.Injunctions
Last amended July 1, 2015 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comments--2000 Amendments
This rule is entirely new in the Minnesota rules; it is drawn directly from F ED. R. CIV. P. 65(d). There is no comparable provision currently in the Minnesota rules and questions do arise about what is necessary to make sure that a party is subject to a court’s injunctive order. The amended rule is intended to resolve those questions.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective July 1, 2015.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 65 governs court orders that stop someone from taking a certain action while a case is pending. A temporary restraining order, or TRO, is meant for urgent situations. Rule 65.01 allows a court to grant one without notifying the other side first, but only if specific facts in an affidavit or verified complaint show that immediate and irreparable harm will happen before the other side can be heard, and the requesting party’s attorney explains in writing what efforts were made to give notice or why notice should not be required. If a TRO is granted without notice, the law requires a prompt hearing on a full temporary injunction, and if the party who got the TRO does not pursue that hearing, the court must dissolve the order. The other side can also ask the court to dissolve or modify a TRO once they learn about it.
A temporary injunction, covered in Rule 65.02, is different: it always requires notice to the other side, either through a motion or an order to show cause, and can be based on affidavits, deposition testimony, or live testimony. Courts also have the option to combine the injunction hearing with a full trial on the merits, and evidence from that hearing can carry over to trial without needing to be repeated.
Rule 65.03 requires the party seeking a TRO or temporary injunction to post security to cover costs and damages if it turns out the other party was wrongfully restrained, and it spells out how a surety on that security can be held liable through a simple motion instead of a separate lawsuit. Finally, Rule 65.04 requires that every injunction or restraining order explain the reasons for issuing it, be specific and not vague, describe clearly what conduct is restrained, and it explains who is bound by the order, generally the parties, their agents, and others acting with them who have actual notice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court grant a restraining order without telling the other side first?
Yes, but only if specific facts show immediate and irreparable harm will occur before the other side can be heard, and the requesting attorney explains in writing the efforts made to give notice or the reasons notice should not be required.
Do I have to put up money to get a temporary restraining order?
Yes. Rule 65.03 requires the applicant to give security in an amount the court considers proper to cover costs and damages if the other party is later found to have been wrongfully restrained.
What happens after a TRO is granted without notice to the other side?
The motion for a temporary injunction must be set for hearing at the earliest practicable time and takes priority over most other matters, and the court will dissolve the TRO if the party who obtained it does not pursue that hearing.
Does a temporary injunction ever require a jury trial?
Rule 65.02 says the procedure for combining an injunction hearing with a trial on the merits must be applied in a way that preserves any right the parties have to a jury trial.
Who is bound by a temporary restraining order?
Rule 65.04 says the order binds the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, plus anyone acting with them who receives actual notice of the order.
Advisory Committee Comments—2015 Amendments
The amendments to Rule 65.03 are not substantive in nature or intended effect. The replacement of “papers” with “documents” is made throughout these rules, and simply advances precision in choice of language. Most documents will not be filed as “paper” documents, so paper is retired as a descriptor of them. The word “transmit” is used in preference to “mail,” recognizing that many documents will be delivered by electronic or means other than the United States mail.