Rule 2.114.Special Motions Under the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act
Current through May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.114
Amendment History
MCR 2.114 implements the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (2025 PA 52), Michigan’s law protecting people from lawsuits aimed at their public speech or petitioning activity, which took effect March 24, 2026. Michigan tracks the order that adopted this rule separately from the compiled rules text reproduced here rather than printing a history note beneath the rule itself. The text above is verified current through the source’s own May 1, 2026 update; for the adopting order and any later amendments, see the Michigan Supreme Court’s rules and orders page.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 2.114 is Michigan's anti-SLAPP mechanism — a special motion available when a lawsuit targets a person's speech, petitioning, or similar protected public expression under the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. A defendant invoking it must file the special motion within 60 days of being served with the claim (extendable for good cause), following the ordinary motion-practice rules while flagging it clearly as a special motion under the Act and stating its statutory basis.
Filing the motion automatically stays the case between the moving party and the responding party — discovery, hearings, everything — and a court can extend that stay to other parties or other discovery tied up in the same issue. Limited discovery can still proceed during the stay if a party shows specific information is truly necessary and otherwise unavailable. If either side appeals the ruling on the motion, the entire case is stayed pending that appeal. The court must hold a hearing within 60 days of the motion being filed (with room to push that back if limited discovery is allowed), and must rule within 60 days after the hearing, looking at the pleadings, the motion, any response, and the evidence submitted. Dismissal with prejudice follows if the moving party shows the claim falls under the Act, the responding party cannot show otherwise, and either the responding party fails to make out a basic case for each element of the claim, the claim fails to state a claim on which relief could be granted, or there is no genuine factual dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Either side can immediately appeal an order deciding a special motion, without waiting for the rest of the case to finish. And whoever wins the motion is generally entitled to court costs, reasonable attorney fees, and litigation expenses tied to it — automatically for a prevailing moving party (including when the responding party voluntarily dismisses the targeted claim with prejudice), and for a prevailing responding party only if the court finds the special motion itself was frivolous or filed just to cause delay. A request for those costs and fees is not paused by the rule's automatic stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of case can a special motion under Rule 2.114 target?
A claim that qualifies as an 'eligible cause of action' under the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, generally a lawsuit arising from a person's speech, petitioning activity, or similar protected public expression.
How quickly does a special motion have to be filed and decided?
The motion must generally be filed within 60 days of being served with the targeted claim. The court must then hold a hearing within 60 days of the filing and rule within 60 days after the hearing, subject to extensions for good cause or to allow limited discovery.
What happens to the rest of the case while a special motion is pending?
Filing the motion automatically stays proceedings between the moving and responding parties, including discovery, and an appeal of the ruling on the motion stays the entire case pending that appeal.
Can the losing side be ordered to pay the other side's attorney fees?
Yes. A prevailing moving party is generally entitled to costs, fees, and expenses tied to the motion, and a prevailing responding party can recover them too if the court finds the special motion was frivolous or filed only to delay the case.