Rule 44.1.Determination of Foreign Law.
Last amended January 1, 2000 · Last verified July 3, 2026
Full Text of Rule 44.1
Amendment History
Added May 15, 1972, effective July 1, 1972
amended July 26, 1990, effective September 1, 1990
further amended December 7, 1999, effective January 1, 2000
Plain-English Summary
A party who wants to raise an issue about the law of a foreign country must give notice through the pleadings or some other reasonable written notice, rather than proving it up like a fact at trial. In figuring out what the foreign law says, the court can consider any relevant material or source it finds useful, including testimony, whether or not a party submitted it or it would otherwise be admissible under the Hawai'i Rules of Evidence.
Whatever the court decides about the foreign law is treated as a ruling on a question of law, not a factual finding, which matters for how the determination gets reviewed on appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a party raise an issue of foreign law?
By giving notice through the pleadings or other reasonable written notice, rather than waiting to prove it as a fact at trial.
What can the court consider in determining foreign law?
Any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not a party submitted it or it would ordinarily be admissible under the Hawai'i Rules of Evidence.
Is a ruling on foreign law treated as a finding of fact?
No. Rule 44.1 treats the court's determination of foreign law as a ruling on a question of law.