Rule 35.Physical and Mental Examination of Persons.
Last amended July 1, 2004 · Last verified July 3, 2026
Full Text of Rule 35
Amendment History
Amended May 15, 1972, effective July 1, 1972
further amended May 7, 2004, effective July 1, 2004
Plain-English Summary
When a party's physical or mental condition, including blood group, is in controversy, the court may order that party, or a person in the party's custody or legal control, to submit to an examination by a qualified examiner, or to be produced for one. The order issues only on a motion showing good cause, after notice to the person being examined and to all parties, and it must spell out the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and identify who will conduct it.
Either the party against whom the order was made or the person examined can request a copy of the examiner's detailed written report, including test results, diagnoses, and conclusions, along with reports from any earlier examinations of the same condition; once that happens, the party who obtained the report becomes entitled to request the same from the other side. Asking for the report, or deposing the examiner, waives the examined party's privilege over the testimony of anyone else who has examined, or later examines, that same condition. These same rules apply to examinations the parties arrange by agreement, unless their agreement says otherwise, and none of this blocks discovery of an examiner's report or deposition through some other route.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a court order someone to undergo a medical examination?
When that person's physical or mental condition is in controversy in the case and a motion shows good cause, with notice given to the person and all parties.
Do I get a copy of the examination report?
Yes, on request, and requesting it means turning over any reports from your own examinations of the same condition in return.
Does requesting the report affect anyone's privilege?
Yes. Requesting the report, or deposing the examiner, waives the examined party's privilege regarding the testimony of any other person who has examined that same condition.