Rule 21.Improper joinder and nonjoinder of parties; severance.
Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 21
Amendment History
Promulgated by R-16-0010, effective January 1, 2017.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 21 protects a case from being thrown out just because someone was added who should not have been, or because Rule 20’s joinder requirements were not perfectly met. Instead of dismissal, the court can act at any point in the case — on terms that are fair to everyone — to drop the improperly joined party, add a party who belongs in the case under Rule 20, or split off any claim into its own independent lawsuit.
That flexibility lets a court fix a joinder mistake without penalizing the rest of the case, and it gives the court a tool to manage a lawsuit that has grown unwieldy by carving out a particular claim to proceed on its own track.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a whole lawsuit be dismissed because a party was improperly joined?
No, misjoinder is never grounds to dismiss the entire action.
What can a court do instead of dismissing a case over a joinder problem?
Drop the improperly joined party, add a party who should be joined, or sever a claim into its own separate action.
Is there a deadline for fixing a joinder problem under Rule 21?
No, the court may act at any time, on terms that are just.