Rule 1.Scope and purpose.
Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1
Amendment History
Promulgated by R-16-0010, effective January 1, 2017.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 1 opens the rule book by defining its own reach: it governs every civil action and proceeding in Arizona's superior courts, whatever the underlying claim. Arizona built these rules on the model of the federal rules, so when a state rule tracks its federal counterpart closely, courts often look to how federal courts have read that rule for guidance.
The rule also tells judges and litigants how to read everything that follows it: the goal is a just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of each case. That instruction matters in practice — courts have used it to keep a case moving rather than letting a party sink it over a procedural misstep, and to explain why the reach of the civil rules extends into areas, like water rights adjudications, that do not look like ordinary “civil actions” at first glance.
Because the rulemaking power for court procedure belongs to the judiciary under Arizona's constitution, the legislature cannot rewrite these rules by statute. That separation keeps the rules of civil procedure and the rules of evidence under the Arizona Supreme Court's control, distinct from ordinary legislation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kinds of cases does Rule 1 cover?
Every civil action and proceeding in Arizona’s superior courts, regardless of the type of relief sought.
Why do Arizona courts sometimes cite federal case law when interpreting these rules?
Because Arizona's civil rules were adapted from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, so where a state rule mirrors its federal counterpart, courts often draw on how federal courts have applied it.
Can the Arizona Legislature change the Rules of Civil Procedure?
No. Rulemaking for the courts is a power the Arizona Constitution gives to the judiciary, so a statute cannot repeal or override a rule of civil procedure.
What does it mean for a rule to be construed for a "just, speedy, and inexpensive" result?
Courts read the rules to move a case toward resolution on the merits, not to let a party lose a case over a technical misstep that does not affect the outcome.